Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 46715 (RAJ)

KAMLESH KUMAR GURJAR, SON OF SHRI HARI NARAYAN GURJAR v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/14568/2025 · 2025-11-14

Ashok Kumar Jain

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:45997] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14568/2025 Kamlesh Kumar Gurjar, Son Of Shri Hari Narayan Gurjar, Aged About 26 Years, A Permanent Resident Of Bhagwan Pura, Post- Satpur. (Rajasthan). 303001 ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, Technical Education Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretarite, Janpath, Jaiprur. 2. Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Its Secretary, Rajaya Krishi Parbandh Sansthan Parisar, Duragapura, Jaipur 302018. 3. Chairman, Staff Selection Board, Rajasthan, Rajaya Krishi Parbandh Sansthan Parisar, Duragapura, Jaipur 302018. 4. Government Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, Department Of Skill, Employment And Entrepreneurship Directorate Of Technical Education, Jodhpur, W-6, Residency Road, Jodhpur (Rajasthan) - 342001. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ravindra Saini For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 14/11/2025 1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer:- “Issue any appropriate writ or direction in the nature of mandamus quash and set aside the impugned disqualification letter dated 04.07.2025 (annexure-6) issued by respondent No.4, directing the respondents to consider candidature to appoint petitioner Roll [2025:RJ-JP:45997] (2 of 3) [CW-14568/2025] No.804147 MBC-M to the post of Junior Instructor (Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Technician) against the MBC reserved vacancies, in accordance with their merit and eligibility, as petitioner is meritorious, as he obtained CITS qualification. ii. Direct the respondents to reconsider the petitioner having qualification and obtained the CITS certificate (Annexure-10) having all relevant qualification, stands fully qualified for appointment and the respondents be directed to issue appointment order forthwith.” 2. During course of arguments, learned counsel for petitioner submits that the petitioner may be granted permission to file an appropriate representation before the respondents- Authority to consider and resolve his grievances. 3. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents-Authority within a period of 15 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to consider and decide the representation after enquiry about grievances, raised by the petitioner but with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After passing the order, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the order to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in his representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he is at liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. [2025:RJ-JP:45997] (3 of 3) [CW-14568/2025] 4. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J PREETI VALECHA /40