Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 46715 (MAD)

RENUKA v. THE STATE REP BY

CRL RC/911/2023 · 2025-02-04

P Velmurugan

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Crl.R.C.No.911 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 04.02.2025 CORAM: THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN Criminal Revision Case No.911 of 2023 Renuka ... Petitioner ..vs.. 1. The State rep.by The Inspector of Police, Sadras Police Station, Chengalpattu District, Crime No.338 of 2021. 2. Latha ... Respondents [ R2 impleaded as per order dated 30.08.2023 in Crl.M.P.No.9167 of 2023 in Crl.R.C.No.911 of 2023] Criminal Revision Case filed under Section 397 and 401 Cr.P.C., praying to call for the records relating to the order dated 11.04.2023 passed by the learned District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate, Thirukalukundram in Crl.M.P.No.1303 of 2023 and set aside the same. For Petitioner : Mr.G.Magesh Kumar For Respondents : Mr.S.Sugendran Additional Public Prosecutor for R1 Mr.G.Vananarayanan for R2 Page No.1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.R.C.No.911 of 2023 O R D E R This Criminal Revision Case is filed to set aside the order dated 11.04.2023 passed by the learned District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate, Thirukalukundram in Crl.M.P.No.1303 of 2023. 2. Heard both sides and perused the materials available on record. 3. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the first respondent submitted that there was a rival claim between the petitioner the second respondent herein regarding the ownership of the jewelery. During the investigation, the first respondent-Police seized the jewels and produced the same before the Judicial Magistrate Court, Thirukalukundram in C.P.No.62 of 2023 on 05.04.2023 and C.P.No.66 of 2023 on 06.04.2023, respectively. 4. Since there was a rival claim between the petitioner and the second respondent herein regarding ownership of the jewelery, both the Page No.2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.R.C.No.911 of 2023 petitioner and the second respondent are at liberty to work out their remedy before the competent Civil Court. 5. With the above direction, this Criminal Revision Case is dismissed. 04.02.2025 Index : Yes/No Neutral Citation Case : Yes/No Speaking Order : Yes/No ms To 1. The District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate, Thirukalukundram. 2. The Inspector of Police, Sadras Police Station, Chengalpattu District. 3. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. Page No.3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.R.C.No.911 of 2023 P.VELMURUGAN, J. ms Crl.R.C.No.911 of 2023 04.02.2025 Page No.4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis