Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 46715 (ALL)

RACHNA SAXENA v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

NA529/1241/2025 · 2025-05-19

Nalin Kumar Srivastava

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:84632 Court No. - 80 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 529 BNSS No. - 1241 of 2025 Applicant :- Rachna Saxena Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Arvind Kumar Srivastava,Virendra Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- Alok Kumar Srivastava,G.A.,Shweta Srivastava Hon'ble Nalin Kumar Srivastava,J. 1. This application under Section 529 BNSS has been filed with a prayer to direct the court concerned to decide the Case No. .... of 2022, arising out of case crime no.159 of 2022, under Sections 419, 420, 406, 467, 468, 471, 504, 506 IPC, Police Station Jhunsi, District Prayagraj pending in the Court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No.5, Allahabad expeditiously within a stipulated period. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned counsel for the opposite party nos. 2 and 3 as well as learned A.G.A. for the State. 3. It appears from the perusal of the record that above case is pending at the stage of recording of evidence. Needless to say that evidence may be adduced by the applicant / informant herself but it is very strange that instead of adducing evidence, the applicant / informant unnecessarily knocked at the door of this Court, which is not a good practice. However, the applicant is directed to appear before the trial court on the next date fixed in the matter for recording her evidence and the Court concerned is directed to make all endeavours for expeditious disposal of the case, if there is no legal impediment. It is further directed that no unnecessary adjournment will be sought/granted. 4. With the above observations, the application stands disposed of. Order Date :- 20.5.2025 safi Digitally signed by :- MAHBOOB SAFI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad