Parupudi Lakshmi Narayana, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
WP/32192/2025 · 2025-11-18
Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 46711 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 46711 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
APHC010623342025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 32192/2025 Between:
1. PARUPUDI LAKSHMI NARAYANA,, S/O P MALLIKHARJUNA RAO AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, PRIVATE EMPLOYEE, R/O D.NO.8-4, VJA- MTM MAIN ROAD, VUYYURU TOWN AND MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 2. PARUPUDI JAYA LAKSHMI,, W/O SRINIVASARAO, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS. PRIVATE SCHOOL TEACHER, R/O D.NO.8-4, VJA-MTM MAIN ROAD, VUYYURU TOWN AND MANDAL KRISHNA DISTRICT. 3. PARUPUDI SIVA KRISHNA,, S/O P BABU RAO, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS. PRIVATE EMPLOYEE, R/O D.NO.8-5, VJA-MTM MAIN ROAD, VUYYURU TOWN AND MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 4. PARUPUDI VENKATA DURGA BHAVANI,, W/O LATE BABU RAO, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS. HOUSE WIFE, R/O D.NO.8-5, VJA-MTM MAIN ROAD, VUYYURU TOWN AND MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT
...PETITIONER(S) AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, MANGALAGIRI, MANGALAGIRI MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENTOF POLICE, KRISHNA DISTRICT, MACHILIPATNAM. 4. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VUYYURU TOWN P.S, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 5. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, (S.H.O), VUYYURU TOWN P.S, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 6. PARUPUDI KANAKA CHINTAIAH VEERAMMA THALLI PERANTALU NILAYAM, VUYYURU, REP.BY. PARUPUDI VEERA VENKATA PRASAD, S/O LATE MALLIKARNJUNA RAO, AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, R/O.D.NO.8-24, VJA-MTM MAIN ROAD, VUYYURU TOWN AND MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 7. PARUPUDI POTHU RAJU, S/O ESWARA RAO, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS. PRIVATE EMPLOYEE,
R/O D.NO.3-206, NEAR
2
VEERAMMA THALLI NILAYAM, VUYYURU TOWN AND MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 8. PARUPUDI SRINU, S/O RAMASWAMY, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, TAAPI MESTRI, R/O D.NO. 1-305/4, HIGH SCHOOL ROAD, VUYYURU TOWN AND MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 9. PARUPUDI CHALAPATHI RAO, S/O SATYANARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS. PVT. EMPLOYEE, R/O D.NO.1-299, HIGH SCHOOL ROAD, VUYYURU TOWN AND MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 10. PARUPUDI VEERA VENKATA SUBBA RAO, S/O VENKATESWARA RAO, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, R/O D.NO.3-198, GEETHA MANDIRAM ROAD, VUYYURU TOWN AND MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT, A.P.
11. PARUPUDI LAVANYA KUMAR, S/O GANGADHARA RAO, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS. POLICE HOME GUARD, R/O D.NO.1-236/1, NEAR VEERAMMA CHERUVU, VUYYURU TOWN AND MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 12. PARUPUDI KRISHNA KUCHELUDU, S/O SAMBASIVA RAO, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/O D.NO.8-277, KATURU ROAD, REVENUE WARD NO.8, VUYYURU TOWN AND MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 13.
DEVANABOINA VENKATESWARA RAO, S/O LATE NARASIMHA MURTHY, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/O D.NO.8-2/1, OLD VIKRAM IT.I. AREA, VUYYURU TOWN AND MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT
...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. T V JAGGI REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following:
ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for:
“.... to issue a Writ, order or direction, especially one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the Respondents No.2 to 5 herein in not providing Police Protection/Aid to petitioners, to perform Archakathvam, management and other aligned activities, to the 6th Respondent institute/temple, as per the Order dt.13-11-2025 in I.A No.375 of 2025 in O.A No.78 of 2025, on the file of the Endowments Tribunal, Andhra Pradesh (Peddakakani), as illegal, arbitrary, non-exercising the powers vested with the office and violation of Article 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondents No.2 to 5 herein to provide
3
Police Protection/Aid to petitioners, to perform Archakathvam for the temple stated supra stated supra.”
2. Heard Sri T.V.Jaggi Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri Md.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that let there be a direction to the respondent/police to take appropriate measures on the representation made by the petitioners in the light of the interim order dated 13.11.2025 in I.A.No.375 of 2025 in O.A.No.78 of 2025 passed by the A.P. Endowments Tribunal, Amaravathi, Pedakakani.
4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that the Court may pass appropriate orders.
5. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the respondent/police are directed to consider the representation of the petitioners in accordance with law and take appropriate measures in the light of the interim order passed by the Tribunal. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. __________________________________ Dr.VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA, J
Date: 19.11.2025 ASR
4
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
W.P.No.32192 of 2025
Dt..19.11.2025
ASR