2025:KER:29421 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPINATH P. FRIDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF APRIL 2025 / 14TH CHAITHRA, 1947 RP NO. 391 OF 2025 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED 17-02-2025 IN WP(C) NO.2591 OF 2025 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA REVIEW PETITIONER/PETITIONER: SHYLA AGED 53 YEARS, W/O. STEPHEN SAJU PULIKKOTTIL, KAIPPANCHERY, NEAR GUEST HOUSE, SULTHAN BATHERY P. O, WAYANAD, PIN – 673 592. BY ADVS. SREEKANTH S.NAIR SANDEEP P JOHNSON RESPONDENT/ RESPONDENT : KERALA STATE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., (KERALA BANK) OPP.KAKKODEN FILLING STATION, SULTHAN BATHERY, WAYANAD REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGER /AUTHORIZED OFFICER, PIN – 673 592. BY ADV. ATHUL SHAJI, SC THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04.04.2025, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: 2025:KER:29421 RP.No.391/2025 2 ORDER This review petition has been filed seeking a review of the judgment dated 17-02-2025 in WP(C)No.2591/2025. 2. Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing for the respondent bank, I find no grounds made out for review of the judgment dated 17-02-2025 in WP(C)No.2591/2025. If the petitioner wishes to prosecute her claim for renewal of the cash credit facility, it will be open to the petitioner to approach the competent authority of the respondent bank, and if such a request is pending, the same shall be considered by the competent authority of the respondent bank. However, this shall not absolve the petitioner from the liability to pay off the amounts as directed in the judgment dated 17-02-2025 in WP(C)No.2591/2025 till a decision is taken by the competent authority of the respondent bank. If the competent authority of the respondent bank decides to renew the cash credit facility, 2025:KER:29421 RP.No.391/2025 3 the petitioner will be governed by the terms of such decision and not by the directions issued by this Court. Review petition is dismissed with the above observations. Sd/- GOPINATH P. JUDGE ats