[2025:RJ-JP:43008] (1 of 2) [CW-21424/2019] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 21424/2019 Ratiram Meena S/o Shri Sriman Meena, R/o Village Sanet Ka Pura, VPO Sanet, Tehsil Hindaun District Karauli, Ration Dealer, Gram Panchayat Sanet, Tehsil Hindaun City District Karauli ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through It Secretary, Department Of Food And Civil Supplies, Rajasthan, Jaipur. 2. District Supply Officer, Karauli. 3. District Collector, Karauli. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shashi Bhushan Gupta, Adv. For Respondent(s) : ------------ HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 27/10/2025 At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that admittedly, petitioner has alternative remedy of filing revision petition against the order impugned before the Food Commissioner/Additional Food Commissioner. It appears from the record that petitioner has straightway approached this court by way of filing this writ petition without availing the alternative remedy. It is a settled proposition of law that whenever alternative remedy is available to a person, he cannot be allowed to bypass a statutory alternative remedy. In view of above, instant writ petition stands disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to approach the appropriate authority [2025:RJ-JP:43008] (2 of 2) [CW-21424/2019] by way of filing revision petition. In case any revision petition is preferred by the petitioner before the revisional authority within a period of one month from today, the revisional authority is directed to treat the revision petition within period of limitation and decide the same on merits after affording opportunity of hearing to all the respective parties, expeditiously as early as possible. Stay application and all applications (pending, if any) also stand disposed of. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J MADAN/67