Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 46703 (RAJ)

M/S SAHARA CREDIT COOPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMP/7366/2023 · 2025-11-28

Anoop Kumar Dhand

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 7366/2023 1. M/s Sahara Credit Cooperative Society Ltd, Through Its Chairman, Devendra Kumar Srivastava S/o Bageshwar Lal Srivastava R/o 8-1/75 Sector- G Aliganj, S.o., Lucknow Uttar Pradesh-226024 2. Rampravesh Son Of Ramavtar Singh, C/o Sahara Credit Cooperative Society Agent, Galta Gate, Jaipur City (North), Jaipur. 3. Sukumar Son Of Naveen Gosowami, C/o Sahara Credit Cooperative Society Agent, Jaipur City (North), 4. Sajjan Singh Son Of Sagardan Singh, C/o Sahara Credit Cooperative Society Zonal Chief, Galta Gate, Jaipur City (North), Jaipur. 5. Subrot Ray Son Of Late Sudhir Chandra Roy, C/o Sahara Credit Cooperative Society Ltd. Owner, Jaipur City, Rajasthan. 6. Om Prakash Son Of Fullan Prasad Srivastav, C/o Sahara Credit Cooperative Society, Director, Jaipur City, Rajasthan. 7. Hanuman Sharma Son Of Unknown, C/o Sahara Credit Cooperative Society, Regional Manager, Jaipur City, Rajasthan. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The P.p 2. Hoshiyar Singh Son Of Sanvan Lal Ram, Resident Of House No. 22, Gangeshwar Nagar, Lal Doongari, Galta Gate, Jaipur (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : None present For Respondent(s) : Mr.Amit Punia, PP JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order (2 of 2) [CRLMP-7366/2023] 28/11/2025 1. This criminal misc. petition is lying pending before this Court in defect side for last more than two years and no steps have been taken by the counsel for the petitioners to cure the defect(s). 2. It appears that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting this matter and have lost interest in pursuing this matter. 3. In view of the above, the instant criminal misc. petition stands dismissed for want of prosecution. Pending applications, if any, also stand dismissed. 4. However, the petitioners would be at liberty to move application for revival of this criminal misc. petition, in case, any cause of action or grievance still survives. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Aayush Sharma /261