1 2025:CGHC:6442 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MAC No. 303 of 2025  Smt. Gauri Bagga W/o Rajesh Kumar Bagga Aged About 38 Years R/o Near Housiya Maszid, Santoshi Nagar Raipur, Tahsil And District Raipur, C.G. (Owner Of Offending Vehicle Bearing Registration Number C.G.- 04, J.B.- 3556) (Non-Applicant No. 2) ... Appellant(s) versus 1. Kripachari S/o Parmanand Aged About 27 Years (Father Of Minor Deceased Pintu Miri), R/o Village And Post Office Garhphuljhar, Police Station And Tahsil Basana, District Mahasamund, C.G. (Claimant) 2. Smt. Ashoda Miri W/o Shri Kirpachari Aged About 26 Years (Mother Of Minor Deceased Pintu Miri), R/o Village And Post Office Garhphuljhar, Police Station And Tahsil Basana, District Mahasamund, C.G. (Claimant) 3. Sikandar Rai S/o Tulsiram Aged About 45 Years R/o Village And Post Office Arjunda, Police Station Saraipali, District Mahasamund, C.G. (Driver Of Offending Vehicle Bearing Registration Number C.G.-04, J.B.-3556) (Non-Applicant No. 1) 4. Reliance General Insurance Company Limited Through Branch Manger, Resident Of Branch Officer Shop No. 516, 5th Floor National Corporation Park Commercial Complex J.E. Road Raipur C.G. (Insurer Of Offending Vehicle Bearing Registration Number C.G.-04, J.B.-3556) (Non-Applicant No. 3) ... Respondent(s) (Cause Title is taken from Case Information System) For Appellant : Mr. Vikram Pratap, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 05. 02.2025 1. The appellant has filed this appeal seeking following relief :- 2 “It is therefore, prayed that the Hon’ble Court be pleased to allow the appeal and set-aside the award dated 25-09- 2024 (Annexure A-1), in the ends of justice.” 2. The appellant/owner preferred an appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicle Act, 1988 (for short “Act, 1988”), but she failed to deposit mandatory amount as required under the Act, 1988. Further the office has granted sufficient time to deposit the said amount, but the appellant failed to deposit the same. 3. Taking into consideration the fact that the appellant failed to deposit the mandatory amount. Accordingly, this appeal is hereby dismissed on this count alone. Sd Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge $iddhant