2025:KER:23240 CRL.MC NO. 2597 OF 2025 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.G.ARUN TUESDAY, THE 18TH DAY OF MARCH 2025 / 27TH PHALGUNA, 1946 CRL.MC NO. 2597 OF 2025 CRIME NO.53/2014 OF CHENGANNOOR POLICE STATION, ALAPPUZHA AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT DATED 06.11.2024 IN CRRP NO.24 OF 2023 OF ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COURT-I,MAVELIKKARA ARISING OUT OF THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN CC NO.1415 OF 2023 OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS -I, CHENGANNUR PETITIONER: MUHAMMED RIYASUDEEN AGED 52 YEARS S/O. ABDUL HAMEED, SAMEER MANZIL, NOORADI, VADAKKAMANNA, KODUR P.O, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT -, PIN - 676504 BY ADVS. SANTHOSH G. PRABHU A.ASWATHY N.U.DEEPA RESPONDENT: STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, PIN - 682031 BY SRI. M.C. ASHI, PP. THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 18.03.2025, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: 2025:KER:23240 CRL.MC NO. 2597 OF 2025 2 ORDER The challenge in this Crl.M.C is against the order of the trial court dismissing the application for discharge filed by the petitioner and of the revisonal court, affirming that order. 2. The short facts are as under; The petitioner is the accused in CC.No.1415 of 2023 on the files of the Judicial Magistrate of First Class -1, Chengannur. The case originated from Crime No.53 of 2014 registered at the Chengannur Police Station for offences punishable under Sections 468 and 471 of IPC. The crime was registered on the allegation that the petitioner had forged the Trade Certificate of Government ITI, Chengannur and obtained employment abroad. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that, other than unsubstantiated allegations, there is no material to prove that the petitioner had not attended the course and was not issued with the certificate. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor asserted that the course mentioned in Annexure A1 certificate was not being taught in any of the institutions at that point of time. 2025:KER:23240 CRL.MC NO. 2597 OF 2025 3 5. Having heard the learned counsel on either side and after going through the impugned orders, this Court is of the definite opinion that the contentions now urged will have to be decided based on the evidence tendered. The Crl.M.C. is hence closed, reserving petitioner’s right to raise all contentions before the trial court. Sd/- V.G.ARUN JUDGE SPV 2025:KER:23240 CRL.MC NO. 2597 OF 2025 4 APPENDIX OF CRL.MC 2597/2025 PETITIONER’S ANNEXURES ANNEXURE A1 TRUE COPY OF NATIONAL TRADE CERTIFICATE DATED 23/12/1992 ISSUED BY THE NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR VOCATIONAL TRAINING ANNEXURE A2 TRUE COPY OF FIR NO. 53/2014 OF CHENGANNUR POLICE STATION DATED 08.01.2014 ALONG WITH FIS AND STATEMENT OF WITNESSES ANNEXURE A3 TRUE COPY OF THE FINAL REPORT DATED 31.12.2014 IN CRIME NO. 53/2014 OF CHENGANNUR POLICE STATION DATED 08.01.2014 ANNEXURE A4 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 06.10.2023 IN CRL M.P. NO. 2277/2023 IN C.C. NO. 1415/2023 OF THE JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT-I, CHENGANNUR ANNEXURE A5 CERTIFIED COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 06.11.2024 IN CRL. R.P. NO. 24/2023 OF THE ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE-I, MAVELIKKARA RESPONDENT’S ANNEXURES : NIL //TRUE COPY// PA TO JUDGE