HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 68819 of 2013 Court No. - 29 HON'BLE MAHESH CHANDRA TRIPATHI, J. HON'BLE KUNAL RAVI SINGH, J. 1. The matter was taken up in the revised list. However, none appeared on behalf of the petitioners to press the petition, nor has any adjournment slip been moved. Learned counsel for the respondents is present. 2. In the absence of any effective representation, it appears that the cause of action has become stale and the writ petition has been rendered infructuous by efflux of time. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. 4. In case the petitioners feel that the matter still survives, liberty is granted to him to move an application for recalling this order within six weeks from today. October 9, 2025 Sumit S Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Amit Krishan, Km. Ruby Chaudhary Counsel for Respondent(s) : Anoop Trivedi (Senior Adv.), Mahendra Pratap, Pradeep Kumar Tripathi, Pranjal Mehrotra (Kunal Ravi Singh,J.) (Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.) Mahendra Singh And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SUMIT SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad