1 2025:CGHC:7385 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CONT No. 19 of 2025 1 - Malti Upadhyay D/o Shatruhan Prasad Upadhyay Aged About 40 Years R/o Hanfa, Hafa, District Bilaspur (C.G.) 495001. 2 - Ajay Dubey S/o Bank Bihari Dubey Aged About 43 Years R/o Ward No. 5, Satyaa Ladies Telar, G.G.D. School Road, Balram Takij Ke Pass, Nehru Nagar, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 495001. 3 - Anita Gautam W/o Amit Kumar Aged About 35 Years R/o Ward No. 3, Durga Chowk, Ghutku, Takhatpur Bilaspur (C.G.) 495112. 4 - Sachin Kaushik S/o Pramod Prasad Kaushik Aged About 33 Years R/o Koni, Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) 5 - Sobha Singh W/o Kailash Singh Kshatri Aged About 42 Years R/o Ward No. 02, Kailash Nagar, Takhatpur, Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) ... Applicant (s) versus 1 - Dr. Priyanka Shukla (Ias) Special Secretary And Director, Directorate Health Services, First Floor, Swasthya Bhawan, Sector-19, Nava Raipur, Atal Nagar, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Shri Vijay Dayaram (Ias)/, Mission Director National Health Mission, Third Floor, Swasthya Bhawan, Sector-19, Nava Raipur Atal Nagar, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Dr. Ajay Shankar Kannoje Deputy Director Cum President, Rationalization Committee, National Health Mission, Third Floor, Swasthya Bhawan, Sector-19, Nava Raipur Atal Nagar, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh NARESH KUMAR KAMDE Digitally signed by NARESH KUMAR KAMDE Date: 2025.02.13 13:05:02 +0530 2 4 - Mr. Shailvin Mika/, State Finance Manager National Health Mission, Third Floor, Swasthya Bhawan, Sector-19, Nava Raipur Atal Nagar, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Applicant (s) : Shri Shyam Kumar, Advocate. For Respondent No.1 : Shri Vivek Sharma, Advocate appearing on behalf of Shri Amiya Bhushan, Advocate. For Respondent No.2 : Shri CJK Rao, Advocate. Hon’ble Shri Justice Arvind Kumar Verma Order on Board 10/02/2025 1. This contempt petition has been preferred by the applicants under Article 215 of the Constitution of India read with Sections 10 & 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 for disobeying the order passed by this Court dated 06/12/2023 passed in WPS No. 9307/2023, relevant portion of the said order reads as under :- “Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions of Counsel appearing for the parties, the instant petition is disposed of giving liberty to the Petitioners to file a fresh representation/s before Respondents No.3 & 8 raising all grounds which they mentioned in the instant petition along with a copy of this petition within two weeks from today and after filing such representation/s Respondents No.3 & 8 in tum are directed to consider and decide the same expeditiously preferably within two months from the date of receipt of such representation/s in accordance with relevant rules and law.” 2. Learned counsel for the respondent No.2 submits that the order/direction of this Court has been complied with and in support thereof place on record Annexure R-2/1 dated 03/02/2025. 3. Perusal of the order Annexure R-2/1 shows that the representations of the applicants have been decided by the respondent/Mission Director. 3 4. In view of above, the order under contempt has been complied with, the contempt petiton as of now stands disposed of, if at all, the applicants are aggrieved by the subsequent order, they would be at liberty to assail the same by way of appropriate petition. Sd/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) JUDGE Kamde