Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010445672025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] THURSDAY,THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 23667/2025 Between:
1. TEMBA MUKUNDARAO, S/O LATE APPANNA, AGED 65 YEARS, OCC RETIRED RAILWAY EMPLOYEE, R/O. S.C. COLONY, NANDIGAMA VILLAGE AND MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, A.P. SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, PALASA DIVISION, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 4. THE TAHSILDAR, NANDIGAMAA MANDAL
SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 5. THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR, SURVEY AND LAND RECORDS SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT
6. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 7. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, NANDIGAMAA VILLAGE AND MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 8. BALAGA APPARAO, S/O LATE SIMHADRI, AGED 55 YEARS, R/O.S.C. STREET,
NANDIGAMA VILLAGE AND MANDAL,
SRIKAKUAM DISTRICT. 9. BALAGA DILLESWARI, W/O APPARAO AGED 45 YEARS, R/O.S.C.
STREET, KLAHDIGAMA VILLAGE AND MARIDAL, SRIKAKUAM DISTRICT. 10. BAJAGA SEKHAR, S/O APPARAO, AGED-22 YEARS, R/O.S.C.
STREET, NANDIGAMA VILLAGE AND MANDAL, SRIKAKUAM DISTRICT. 11. KURAMANA SIMHACHALAM, S/O APPANNA, AGED 55 YEARS, R/O.S.C. STREET, NANDIGAMA VILLAGE AND MANDAL, SRIKAKUAM DISTRICT. 12. KURAMANA RAMALAKSHMI, W/O SIMHACHALAM, AGED 42 YEARS R/O.S.C. STREET, NANDIGAMA VILLAGE ANDMANDAL, SRIKAKUAM DISTRICT. 13. KURAMANA DHANALAKSHMI, D/O SIMHACHALAM, AGED 38 YEARS, R/O.S.C. STREET, NANDIGAMA VILLAGE AND MANDAL, SRIKAKUAM DISTRICT. 14. KURAMANA DURGA PRASAD, S/O SIMHACHALAM, AGED 25 YEARS, R/O.S.C. STREET, NANDIGAMA VILLAGE AND MANDAL, SRIKAKUAM DISTRICT. 15. KURAMANA SANTHOSHI RANI, D/O APPAYYA, AGED 56 YEARS, R/O.S.C. STREET, NANDIGAMA VILLAGE AND MANDAL, SRIKAKUAM DISTRICT. 16. BATTERU ANANDARAO, S/O LATE RAMAYYA, AGED 55 YEARS, R/O.S.C. STREET, NANDIGAMA VILLAGE AND MANDAL, SRIKAKUAM DISTRICT. 17. BATTERU KASAMMA, W/O ANANDARAO, AGED 50 YEARS, R/O.
HOUSEWIFE, R/O.S.C. STREET, NANDIGAMA VILLAGE AND MANDAL, SRIKAKUAM DISTRICT. 18. BATTERU DURGA PRASAD, S/O ANANDARAO, AGED 22 YEARS, R/O.S.C. STREET, NANDIGAMA VILLAGE AND MANDAL, SRIKAKUAM DISTRICT. 19. CHUKKA BHANUMATHI, W/O LATE ESWARA RAO, AGED 55 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEHOLD, R/O.S.C. STREET, NANDIGAMA
VILLAGE AND MANDAL, SRIKAKUAM DISTRICT. 20. CHUKKA HARIKRISHNA, S/O LATE ESWARARAO, AGED 30 YEARS, R/O.S.C. STREET, NANDIGAMA VILLAGE AND MANDAL, SRIKAKUAM DISTRICT. 21. KURAMANA PARAMMA, W/O APPAYYA, AGED 70 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEWIFE, R/O.S.C. STREET, NANDIGAMA VILLAGE AND MANDAL, SRIKAKUAM DISTRICT. 22. MATTA UMAPATHI, S/O LATE RAMARAO, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, R/O.S.C. STREET, NANDIGAMA VILLAGE AND MANDAL, SRIKAKUAM DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toPleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of Respondents not conducting survey with sub-division and fix the boundaries of the petitioner's land to an extent of Ac.0-19 cents in Sy.No.133/2, situated at Nandigama Village, Nandigama Mandal, Srikakulam District, despite of made F-Line Application and Sub- Division applications filed by the Petitioner, as illegal, arbitrary and against the provisions of Survey and Boundaries Act, 1923 and against all settled principles of law and consequently direct the Respondentsto conduct survey of the land to an extent of Ac.0-19 cents in Sy.No.133/2, situated at Nandigama Village, Nandigama Mandal, Srikakulam District by conducting panchanamma and fix the boundary stones and topass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the Respondents to consider the a fresh representation dt. 24.07.2025 made by the Petitioner in respect of land to an extent of Ac.0-19 cents in Sy.No.133/2, situated at Nandigama Village, Nandigama Mandal, Srikakulam District, pending disposal of the Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. KALLA TULASI DURGAMBA Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME
2. GP FOR REVENUE
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No.23667 of 2025 ORDER:-
Shorn of all unnecessary facts asserted in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the specific case of the petitioner is that petitioner is the absolute owner and possessor of the subject land.
He has submitted F-Line application bearing No.FS011800088826, dated 02.12.2018, through online, for conducting survey, sub-division, demarcation and fixation of boundaries of his land i.e. Ac.0.19 cents in Sy.No.133/2 of Nandigama Village and Mandal, Srikakulam District, and in order to avoid disputes with the neighbouring land owners. However, the respondent-authorities went on postponing the survey. Despite the petitioner’s persistent requests, the inaction of the respondent authorities in processing the petitioner F-Line application has constrained him to approach this Court. 2. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for respondents has submitted that as the F-Line application submitted by the petitioner is of the year 2018, the petitioner may be directed to submit a fresh application and the same may be considered in accordance with law. 3. Considering the submissions of both the learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, without going into the merits of case, the Writ Petition is disposed of permitting the petitioner to submit a fresh F-Line application for conducting survey, sub- division and fixing of boundaries of the petitioner’s subject land. On filing such
application, the respondents are directed to consider the same by issuing notice to all concerned/interested persons, and pass appropriate orders, in accordance with law, within a period of six (06) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 25.09.2025 TVN
220
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO
WRIT PETITION No.23667 OF 2025
Date: 25.09.2025 TVN