(116) Mamta Rani State of Haryana CORAM: Present: ALOK JAIN 1. Constitution of India for the issuance of an appropriate writ, order or direction especially in the nature of certiorari for quashing 08.04.2025 (Annexure P 2. order is contrary to letter dated 06.03.2025 (Annexure P Additional Chief Secretary, which was also duly forwarded by Joint Registrar (Admn.), State Panchkula. He has raised other issues also. 3. 4. the respondents SCDRC, Haryana is pr IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Mamta Rani Versus State of Haryana and Ors. HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK JAIN **** Mr. L.K. Gollen, (through VC) for the petitioner. Mr. Vikram Singh, AAG, Haryana. Mr. Vijay Sharma, Joint Registrar (Admn.) SCDRC, Haryana in person. **** ALOK JAIN, J. (Oral) The present petition has been filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of an appropriate writ, order or direction especially in the nature of certiorari for quashing (Annexure P-7). Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the transfer order is contrary to letter dated 06.03.2025 (Annexure P Additional Chief Secretary, which was also duly forwarded by Joint Registrar ), State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Haryana, Panchkula. He has raised other issues also. Notice of motion. Mr. Vikram Singh, AAG, Haryana, accepts notice on behalf of respondents 1 to 4 and Mr. Vijay Sharma, Joint Registrar (Admn.) SCDRC, Haryana is present in person. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.10806 of 2025 Date of Decision:- 15.04.2025 ……Petitioner ……Respondents ALOK JAIN L.K. Gollen, (through VC) for the petitioner. Mr. Vikram Singh, AAG, Haryana. Mr. Vijay Sharma, Joint Registrar (Admn.) SCDRC, Haryana The present petition has been filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of an appropriate writ, order or direction especially in the nature of certiorari for quashing transfer order dated Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the transfer order is contrary to letter dated 06.03.2025 (Annexure P-6) issued by Additional Chief Secretary, which was also duly forwarded by Joint Registrar Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Haryana, Mr. Vikram Singh, AAG, Haryana, accepts notice on behalf of and Mr. Vijay Sharma, Joint Registrar (Admn.) 15.04.2025 ……Petitioner ……Respondents The present petition has been filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of an appropriate writ, order or direction dated Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the transfer ) issued by Additional Chief Secretary, which was also duly forwarded by Joint Registrar Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Haryana, Mr. Vikram Singh, AAG, Haryana, accepts notice on behalf of and Mr. Vijay Sharma, Joint Registrar (Admn.) Manju 2025.04.15 15:37 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP No.10806 of 2025 5. representation of the petitioner for withdrawal of the transfer order has been filed on 08.04.2025, which is pending before the authorities has been duly President of the State Commission is on leave till 19.04.2025 and they will decide the present representation within 03 working days thereafter and shall also afford an o any order. 6. rights and averments be kept in abeyance till the decision on the representation with respect to the petitioner. 7. case, the present petition is disp dated 09.04.2025 (Annexure P expeditiously within 10 days from today and till then the transfer order of the petitioner be kept in abeyance. 8. on the transfer of other employees in the impugned order dated (Annexure P 9. April 15, 2025 manju CWP No.10806 of 2025 At this stage, learned counsel for State has pointed out that representation of the petitioner for withdrawal of the transfer order has been filed on 08.04.2025, which is pending before the authorities duly verified by respondent No.5, who has fairly submitted that President of the State Commission is on leave till 19.04.2025 and they will decide the present representation within 03 working days thereafter and shall also afford an opportunity of personal hearing to the petitioner before passing At this stage, learned counsel for petitioner reserving averments raised in the present petition prays that the transfer order be kept in abeyance till the decision on the representation with respect to the In light of the above, without commenting on the merits of the case, the present petition is disposed of with a direction that the representation .04.2025 (Annexure P-10) be decided by respondent No.2 expeditiously within 10 days from today and till then the transfer order of the petitioner be kept in abeyance. It is made clear that this order shall not be construed as any stay on the transfer of other employees in the impugned order dated P-7) and pertains only to the present The present petition is disposed of in above terms. l 15, 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether Reportable:- Yes/No -2- counsel for State has pointed out that representation of the petitioner for withdrawal of the transfer order has been filed on 08.04.2025, which is pending before the authorities and the said fact verified by respondent No.5, who has fairly submitted that President of the State Commission is on leave till 19.04.2025 and they will decide the present representation within 03 working days thereafter and shall pportunity of personal hearing to the petitioner before passing At this stage, learned counsel for petitioner reserving all his raised in the present petition prays that the transfer order be kept in abeyance till the decision on the representation with respect to the commenting on the merits of the osed of with a direction that the representation 10) be decided by respondent No.2 expeditiously within 10 days from today and till then the transfer order of the order shall not be construed as any stay on the transfer of other employees in the impugned order dated 08.04.2025 and pertains only to the present petitioner. The present petition is disposed of in above terms. (ALOK JAIN) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No counsel for State has pointed out that representation of the petitioner for withdrawal of the transfer order has been and the said fact verified by respondent No.5, who has fairly submitted that President of the State Commission is on leave till 19.04.2025 and they will decide the present representation within 03 working days thereafter and shall pportunity of personal hearing to the petitioner before passing all his raised in the present petition prays that the transfer order be kept in abeyance till the decision on the representation with respect to the commenting on the merits of the osed of with a direction that the representation 10) be decided by respondent No.2 expeditiously within 10 days from today and till then the transfer order of the order shall not be construed as any stay 08.04.2025 Manju 2025.04.15 15:37 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document