Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 46670 (AP)

CHANDAKA APPA RAO, v. MASTER CHANDAKA SYAM KALIDAS AND 2 OTHERS,

CRLRC/1202/2009 · 2025-12-02

A Hari Haranadha Sarma, Battu Devanand

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010241742009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3545] WEDNESDAY,THE THIRD DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1202/2009 Between: 1. CHANDAKA APPA RAO,, S/O. LATE SIMHACHALAM, R/O. D,..NO. 15-15-21, BUDDAVARAPU GARDENS, MAHARANIPETA, ...PETITIONER AND 1. MASTER CHANDAKA SYAM KALIDAS AND 2 OTHERS, S/O. APPA RAO, R/O. D.NO. 55-40-102, H.B.COLONY, SEETHAMMADARA, 2. CHANDAKA REKHA RANI, D/O. APPA RAO, R/O. D.NO. 55-40-102, H.B.COLONY,SEETHAMMADARA,VISAKHAPATNAM RR 1 & @ BEING MINORS REP BY THEIR MOTHER CHANDA RAMANAMMA @ 3. THE STATE OF A P, REP.BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF A.P., HYDERABAD. ...RESPONDENT(S): Revision filed under Section 397/401 of CrPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the Criminal Revision Case, the High Court may be pleased to call for the record in M.C.No. 90/2006 from the file of Family Court, Visakhapatnam and set aside the order dated 05.3.2009 IA NO: 1 OF 2009(CRLRCMP 1651 OF 2009 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay the execution of the order dt.05.03.2009 passed by the family Court , Visakhapatnam M.C.No. 90/2006 Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. N (P) ANJANA DEVI SATYANARAYANA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. K SOMESWARA KUMAR 2. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following: THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND & THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO.1202 of 2009 ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Battu Devanand) Mr Sai Rohith, learned counsel appears on behalf of learned Public Prosector for the State. 2. On 15.10.2025, there is no representation on either side. Hence, the matter is posted to 29.10.2025 under the caption 8for dismissal9. On 29.10.2025, the matter was adjourned to 12.11.2025. On 12.11.2025, there was no representation for the petitioner. Hence, posted to 26.11.2025 under the same caption. On 26.11.2025 also, there is no representation for the petitioner. To give one more opportunity to the petitioner, the matter is posted to 03.12.2025. Today also, there is no representation for the petitioner. 3. It appears that the petitioner has no interest to prosecute this Criminal Revision Case. 4. Accordingly, this Criminal Revision Case is dismissed for non prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND __________________________________ JUSTICE A.HARI HARANADHA SARMA Dated: 03.12.2025 TM THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND & THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO.1202 of 2009 Dated: 03.12.2025 TM