,yii IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI MONDAY,THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 63 OF 2011 Between: Bokka Chinna Srinivasu @ Srinu, S/o. Bangaraiah, Aged about 27 years, R/o. Bonthuvaripalem Village, Now at Railway Station Road, Attilli Village. ...ACCUSED/APPELLANT AND The State of A.P.,Rep.By Public Prosecutor, High Court, of Andhra Pradesh Amaravati ...RESPONDENT Revision filed under Section 397 & 401 of CrPC., praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the Criminal Revision Case, the High Court may be pleased to present this memorandum of revision case against the order dated 21-12-2010 in Criminal Appeal No. 154 of 2010 on the file of the III Addl. Sessions Judge, (Fast Track Court) Bhimavaram, West Godavari District. Counsel for the Petitioner(s) : SRI P N MURTHY Counsel for the Respondents : PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following ORDER : 1 Dr.YLikj Crl.R.C.No.63 of 2011 Dated 17.02.2025 .APHC010269922011 i • IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) I ,/■ '-r ■! [3521] V' I"/' v . >^1 ¥■ /. ( % MONDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 63/2011 Between: I.Bokka Chinna Srinivasu @ Srinu, Attilli Village, S/o. Bangaraiah R/o. Bonthuvaripalem Village, Now at Railway Station Road, Attilli Village. ...PETITIONER AND I.The State of A.P rep by Public Prosecutor High Court Hyd, rep by the Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P. Hyderabad. ...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Petitioner: P.N.MURTHY Counsel for the Respondent: Public Prosecutor The Court made the following: ORDER: 7 n ‘i The revisionist Bokka Chinna Srinivasu @ Srinu and the de- facto/complainant Bokka Bhagyalakshmi are present. 4? 4? 2 Dr.Yl^J Crl.R.CNo.63 of2011 Dated 17.02.2025 The revision was filed against concurrent conviction for the offence under Section 498-A of ‘the I.P.C.,’. 2. 3. A memo dated 17.02.2025 is filed by the learned counsel for the revisionist with the signatures of the revisionist and the de-facfo/complainant. The revisionist and the de-facto/complainant themselves submitted in the memo that they both have compromised the disputes among themselves and are living together and leading matrimonial life happily with their children who are studying B.Tech and Degree respective;u. 5. In view of the memo filed by the learned counsel for the revisionist that the matter has been compromised, the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor reported no objection. 6. Accordingly, the Criminal Revision Case compromised. There shall be no order as to costs. Interim orders granted earlier, if any, shall stand vacated. As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall stand is disposed of as closed. SD/- M.RAMESH BABU DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The III Addl. Sessions Judge, (Fast Track Court) Bhimavaram, West Godavari District \% 2. The principal Civil Judge, (Junior Division ) -CUM - Judicial First Class Magistrate Court .Bhimavaram West Godavari District 3. One CC to SRI. P N MURTHY Advocate [OPUC] 4. Two CCstothe Public Prosecutor High Court of A.P [OUT] 5. The Section Officer, Criminal Section, High Court of Andhra Amaravathi 6. THREE CD COPIES at Amaravati Pradesh at SD TAC HIGH COURT DATED:17/02/2025 % ORDER CRLRC.No.63 of 2011 DISPOSED OF THE CRLRC AS COMPROMISED