AKASH GUPTA S/O RAKESH KUMAR GUPTA v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMP/6315/2025 · 2025-11-07
Anoop Kumar Dhand
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 46656 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 46656 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 6315/2025
1. Akash Gupta S/o Rakesh Kumar Gupta, Aged About 34 Years, R/o 3064, Tower C, Zara Rosa, Sector 112, Bajgheda, Gurugram - 122017, Currently In Central Jail, Jaipur
2. Abhyuday Gupta S/o Rakesh Kumar Gupta, Aged About 26 Years, R/o 1095, 9Th Floor, Tower A, Zara Rosa, Sector - 112, Bajghera, Gurugram - 122018
3. Sujakta Bhattacharya W/o Akash Gupta, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Flat No. 3064, C-Block, Zara Rosa, Sector-112, Bajghera, Gurugram - 122018 ----Petitioners Versus
1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor, Rajasthan High Court, Jaipur.
2. Mohinder Singh (Complainant) S/o Arjan Singh, R/o 144, Sirsi Road, Officers Campus, Vaishali Nagar, Jaipur (West), 302021 ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rakshit Jaimini For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Punia, PP Mr. Yash Sharma JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 07/11/2025
1. Counsel for the parties are in agreement that the dispute between the parties has been settled on 06.11.2025 by way of entering into a compromise. Counsels submit that the aforesaid compromise has been verified by the Registrar (Judicial). Counsels submit that the allegations levelled in the FIR are of personal nature, so under the changed circumstances, the
(2 of 2) [CRLMP-6315/2025] proceedings arising out of the FIR No.93/2025 registered with the Police Station Vaishali Nagar, District Jaipur (West) be quashed.
2. Since the factum of compromise has not been disputed by counsel appearing on behalf of the complainant and he has no objection in case, the proceedings of the aforesaid FIR are quashed and also applying the principles of law as laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab & Anr. reported in (2012) 10 SCC 303 & State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Laxmi Narayan & Ors., reported in (2019) 5 SCC 688, this Court deems it just and appropriate to invoke inherent powers of this Court under Section 528 of the BNSS.
3. Accordingly, this criminal misc. petition is allowed. Proceedings arising out of the impugned FIR No.93/2025 registered with Police Station Vaishali Nagar, District Jaipur (West) for the offences under Sections 61(2), 316(2) and 318(4) are quashed.
4. The stay application and all pending applications, if any, stand disposed of.
(ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J KuD/265