Kunal Kakkar v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND THROUGH SECRETARY HOME GOVT.OF UTTARAKHAND
CRLR/211/2016 · 2025-07-02
Rakesh Thapliyal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 4665 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 4665 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:UHC:5591 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s
order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
CRLR No. 211 of 2016 Hon’ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J.
1. Mr. Mohd Azim, learned counsel for the revisionist.
2. Mr. Siddhartha Bisht, learned AGA for the State.
3.
Learned counsel for the revisionist submits that the parties have settled their dispute by way of amicable settlement and a comprise entered in between the parties, and as such, the instant revision is rendered infructuous.
4. In view of the statement as given by
learned counsel for the revisionist, the instant criminal revision is dismissed as infructuous.
(Rakesh Thapliyal, J.)
02.07.2025 R.Bisht
2025:UHC:5591