[2025:RJ-JP:6129] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1942/2025 1. Rajendra Kumar Sethi Son Of Shri Nauratmal Sethi, 2. Smt. Usha Sethi Wife Of Shri Rajendra Kuamr Sethi, Both residenta Of 36A, Agarwal Colony, R K Link Marg, Madanganj Kishangarh, District Ajmer, Rajasthan. 3. Nitin Jain Son Of Shri Rajendra Kumar Sethi, Resident Of 36A, Agarwal Colony, R K Link Marg, Madanganj Kishangarh, District Ajmer, Rajasthan. Second Address Nitin Jain Son Of Shri Rajendra Kumar Sethi Soochna Sayak, Rajkiya Yagnaryan Chiktsalya, City Road, Madanganj Kishangarh, District Ajmer, Rajasthan. ----Petitioners/Non-applicants Versus 1. Rashi Jain Wife Of Late Shri Nakul Raj Sethi, Aged About 33 Years, Resident Of 40, Kusum Vihar Colony, Behind R K House, City Road, Madanganj Kishangarh, District Ajmer, Rajasthan. 2. Minor Gagan Son Of Late Shri Nakul Raj Sethi, Aged About 9 Years, Through His Natural Guardian Rashi Jain Wife Of Late Shri Nakul Raj Sethi, Resident Of 40, Kusum Vihar Colony, Behind R K House, City Road, Madanganj Kishangarh, District Ajmer, Rajasthan. ......Respondents/ Applicants 3. The Chief Administrative Officer, Department Of Atomic Energy, Rajaramanna Centre For Advance Technology, Establishment Cell, Post Office Cant, Indore-452013. 4. The Manager, State Bank Of India, Kant Campus, Sukhnivas, Indore, District Indore (Madhya Pradesh)-452013. 5. The Manager, State Bank Of India, Kalpakkam, Tamil Naidu. 6. General, Public. ---Proforma-Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Harshit Mittal For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL Order 12/02/2025 1. Petitioners have preferred instant civil writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, challenging the order dated 05.08.2024 passed by the Additional District Judge No.1, [2025:RJ-JP:6129] (2 of 2) [CW-1942/2025] Kishangarh, Ajmer, dismissing their application under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC, seeking impleadment of Post Office Indore, The Baba Atomic Reasearch Center Employees Co-operative Credit Society Limited Mumbai, Reserve Bank of India and HDFC Bank Indore, as parties to the proceedings of Succession under Section 372 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925. 2. The Additional District Judge No.1, Kishangarh, Ajmer in the order impugned has assigned justified reasons for dismissing the application under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC. 3. Counsel for the petitioner, after arguing the writ petition, seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition. 4. In view of above, the writ petition is being dismissed as withdrawn. 5. Stay application and any other pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (SUDESH BANSAL),J TN/47