SURAJ SINGH @ SURAT SINGH @ SUKH SINGH S/O SOBHAN SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/11499/2025 · 2025-10-16
Farjand Ali
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 46646 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 46646 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:42761] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous II Bail Application No. 11499/2025 Suraj Singh @ Surat Singh @ Sukh Singh S/o Sobhan Singh, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Gangapura, Police Station Bhawanimandi, District Jhalawar, Rajasthan. (Presently Confined In Sub Jail Bhawani Madni Since 20.02.2022) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shafiqur Rahman with Mr. Saroj Jat For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajendra Singh Shekhawat, PP Mr. JP Tiwari, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FARJAND ALI (THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCING)
Order 16/10/2025
1. The jurisdiction of this Court has been invoked by way of filing application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. at the instance of accused-petitioner. The requisite details of the matter are tabulated herein below: S.No. Particulars of the Case
1. FIR Number 218/2021
2. Concerned Police Station Bhawani Mandi
3. District Jhalawar
4. Offences alleged in the FIR Under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 302, 307 of IPC
5. Offences added, if any -
6. Date of passing of impugned
order -
[2025:RJ-JP:42761] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-11499/2025]
2. It is contended on behalf of the accused-petitioner that no case for the alleged offences is made out against him and his incarceration is not warranted. There are no factors at play in the case at hand that may work against grant of bail to the accused-petitioner and he has been made accused based on conjectures and surmises. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the co-accused has already been enlarged on bail. He further submits that case of the petitioner is on better footing than to the case of the petitioner.
3. Contrary to the submissions of learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Public Prosecutor opposes the bail application and submits that the present case is not fit for enlargement of accused on bail.
4. I have considered the submissions made by both the parties and have perused the material available on record. Co-accused Hukum Singh and Ishwar Singh have already been enlarged on bail vide order dated 25.07.2025 passed in S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Applications Nos.14142/2024 and 14143/2024. The case of the petitioner is on better footing than to the case of the co-accused. There is high probability that the trial may take long time to conclude. In view of the above, it is deemed suitable to grant the benefit of bail to the petitioner in the present matter.
5. Accordingly, the instant bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. are allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner as named in the cause title shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two
[2025:RJ-JP:42761] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-11499/2025] sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so.
(FARJAND ALI),J 14-divya/-