r IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH::AMARAVAT (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SREENIVASA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO: 1155 OF 2024 Between: PusapatiSitaramaRaju, s/o. Sri (Late) Appala VarahaNarasimhaRaju , aged about 70 years, Occupation; Business, residing at Door Number- 10-27-2/34, Flat Number- 501, Lakshmi Apt., Kailashmetta, Waltair Uplands, Visakhapatnam-530003, Andhra Pradesh. Aadhar Number- 7979 9432 9899, Email:Ds'r^rij@Qmail.com Mobile: 91-9393107777. ...Petitioner mo 1. The Chairman and Managing l3irector, Andhra Pradesh Industrial Infrastructure Corporation'Lifhifed (APIIC Ltd), APIIC Towers, (9 & 11 Floors) IT Park, Mangalagiri, Guntur (Dist.) Andhra Pradesh - 522503. th th 10 2. The Zonal Manager, Andhra Pradesh Industrial Infrastructure Corporation Limited (ApTIC Ltd), District Industries Centre, APIIC Building, Industrial Estate, Vfeakhapatnam - 530 007. 3. The State of Andhra Pradesh,-rep. by its Principal Secretary, Ministry of Industries, Government of Aridhra Pradesh, Room No. 102, Block 2, Andhra Pradesh Secretariat, Vdlagapudi, Andhra Pradesh. 4. The State of Andhra PfadesH; rep. by it’s the Chief Secretary, Floor, Interim Government of Andhrd l%desh St Building#1, 1 Government Complex, Andhra Pradesh Secretariat, Velagapudi Guntur, Andhra Pradesh. ) 5. The District Collector & Magistrate, Visakhapatnam District, and Chairman District Industries Centre, District Collector’s Office, Maharanipet, Visakhapatriam-530002 ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ. Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 1st and 2nd Respondents erred in not passing any order allowing for the change of activity to “Food court and Hotel” as Hotel Business is also comes under Industry and it is an “Industrial activity of petitioner business is not consider and change of the business activity is illegal, arbitrary and contrary to the law and clear violation od principals of natural Justice and violation of Article 14,19,21 of constitution of India. And consequently direct the respondents here in to continue to allowing for the change of activity to Food court and Hotel’” as Hotel Business is also comes under “Industry” and it is an Industrial activity bf petitioner business. Counsel for the Petitioner:SRI. 6 V S CHALAPATI RAO Counsel for the Respondent: SMTiSANTHI CHANDRA SC For APIIC : GP FOR INDUSTRIES : GP FOR REVENUE : SRFJ. UGNA NARASIMHA, STANDING COONSEL The Court made the following 4 HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K. SREENIVASA REDDY Writ Petition No. 1155 of 2024 This Writ Petition has been filed questioning the action of the respondents 1 and 2 in not allowing for change of activity to "Food Court and Hotel" as Hotel business also comes within the purview of industry. Today, when the matter came up for admission, learned 2. counsel for the petitioner submits that in the month of December, 2024, the Government has recognized that the Hotel business also comes under Industry and, since the grievance raised in the Writ petition has been resolved, he seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the Writ Petition. In view of the said reason, permission is accorded and, accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall 130 no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Writ Petition, shall stand closed. 3 Sd/- N NAGAMMA ASSISTANT REGISTRAR \ //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, one CC to SRI B V S CHALAPATI RAO Advocate [OPUC] 1. One CC to SRI SANTHI CHANDRA SC For APIIC Advocate [OPUC] Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] Two CCs to GP FOR INDUSTRIES. High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] One CC to SRI J. UGNA NARASIMHA, Standing Counsel [OPUC] 6. Three CD Copies KJ (gsg) r 4. 5. / . ' t v' } '' HIGH COURT DATED:06/05/2025 ORDER WP.No.1155 of 2024 DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN