SUMAN WIFE OF SHRI SOMVIR SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/17720/2025 · 2025-11-27
Ashok Kumar Jain
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 46636 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 46636 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:48352] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17720/2025 Suman Wife Of Shri Somvir Singh, Aged About 45 Years, Resident Of Ward No. 01, Main Market, Mandrela, District Jhunjhunu. Presently Posted On The Post Of A.n.m., At C.h.c. Mandrela, Block Chirawa, District Jhunjhunu (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, Medical And Health Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.)
2. Director (Non Gazzattee), Medical And Health Services And Additional Director (Administration), Panchyatiraj (Medical) Department, Rajasthan, Tilak Marg, Swasthya Bhawan, Jaipur (Raj.). 3. Chief Medical And Health Officer, Jhunjhunu District Jhunjhunu (Raj.)
4. Block Chief Medical And Health Officer, Chirawa, District Jhunjhunu (Raj.)
5. Medical Officer Incharge, C.h.c. Mandrela, Block Chirawa, District Jhunjhunu (Raj). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Bajrang Sepat for Ms. Komal Giri Goswami For Respondent(s) : Mr. Archit Bohra, AGC HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 27/11/2025
1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer:-
“(i). By an appropriate writ order or direction in the nature therein thereby respondents may kindly be directed to pay the salary to petitioner from her actual post i.e. A.N.M. instated of post of Technical Assistant from the present posing place i.e. Community Health Center Mandrela, Block Chirawa, District
[2025:RJ-JP:48352] (2 of 2) [CW-17720/2025] Jhunjhunu in the larger interest of justice. (ii). Issue any other writ order or direction, which this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper, may kindly be passed in favour of the petitioner. (iii)Cost of the writ petition be also awarded in favour of the petitioner.”
2. During course of arguments, learned counsel for petitioner submits that the petitioner may be granted permission to file an appropriate representation before the respondents- Authority to consider and resolve his grievances. 3. Mr. Archit Bohra, AGC, accepts notice. Office is directed to reflect his name in the cause list. 4. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents-Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to consider and decide the representation after enquiry about grievances, raised by the petitioner but with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation.
After the order, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in her representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, she is at liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 5. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J MR/114