Research › Search › Judgment
Bombay High Court · body
2025 DAILYLAW 46636 (BOM)
VINAYAK S/O LAXMANRAO JADHAV v. DURGASHANKAR GHANSHYAM AGRAWAL
CAS/787/2025 · 2025-10-16
Shri Rohit Wasudeo Joshi
body2025
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 46636 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 46636 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
31. CAS 787 of 2025.odt 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION (CAS) NO.787/2025 IN SECOND APPEAL ST. NO.4204/2025 Shri Vinayak S/o Lakshamanrao Jadhav ...Versus… Shri Durgashankar S/o Ghanshyam Agrawal - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --- - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ----- ------------ - Mr. K.B. Zinjarde, Advocate for applicant
CORAM : ROHIT W. JOSHI, J.
DATE : 16/10/2025
1. There is a delay of 14 days in filing the second appeal. The respondent sole has not entered appearance despite being served.
2. For the reasons stated in the application, delay caused in filing the second appeal is condoned. Office is
directed to register the appeal and place the same for admission on 19/11/2025.
3. The civil application is allowed the disposed of accordingly.
(ROHIT W. JOSHI, J.) Wadkar 2025:BHC-NAG:11115