DEVYANI RATHORE W/O SH. NARENDRA SINGH BHATI v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMP/8566/2024 · 2025-11-25
Anoop Kumar Dhand
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 46634 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 46634 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 8566/2024
1. Devyani Rathore W/o Sh. Narendra Singh Bhati, Aged About 34 Years, Resident Of D-235, Bihari Marg, Banipark, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
2. Gyarsi Lal S/o Sh. Jagnath, Aged About 65 Years, Village Tevdi, Tehsil Virat Nagar, District Kotputli- Behror, Rajasthan. ----Petitioners Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Learned Public Prosecutor.
2. Shivraj Singh Rathore S/o Shri Tej Singh, Aged About 45 Years, R/o H.no. S-3, Jk Residency, Niwaru Road, Jhotwara, Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ashish Poonia For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Punia, PP JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 25/11/2025
1. The instant criminal misc. petition has been preferred for quashing the proceedings of the impugned FIR No.167/2024 registered with the Police Station Sindhicamp, District Jaipur (West) under Sections 115(2), 126(2) and 352 of the BNS,
2023.
2. At the outset, the Public Prosecutor submitted that after thorough investigation in the matter from all four corners, the Police has found the instant case to be false in nature, hence final report negative has been submitted before the Court of
(2 of 2) [CRLMP-8566/2024] Judicial Magistrate No.5, Jaipur Metropolitan-II on 14.10.2025, therefore under the changed circumstances, no cause of action survives with the petitioner to continue with this petition and the same has become infructuous.
3. Considering the above factual aspect of the matter, the instant criminal misc. petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. The stay application and all pending applications, if any, also stand dismissed.
4. The factual report furnished by the Public Prosecutor is ordered to be retained on the record.
(ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J KuD/37