Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 46629 (AP)

A.Bhaskara Rao, v. The Deputy Registrar of Cooperative Societies,

WP/20380/2012 · 2025-02-24

Harinath N

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 20380 OF 2012 / Between: A.Bhaskara Rao, S/o Jogi Naidu, aged about 46 years, Chief Executive Meer, Kokkirapalli P.A.C.S., Yellamanchili Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. ...PETITIONER AND 1. The Deputy Registrar of Cooperative Societies, Yellamanchili, Visakhapatnam District. 2. The Kokkirapalli Primary Agricultural, Cooperative Society Ltd., No. 1855, Yellamanchili, Visakhapatnam District Rep. by its President. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the proceedings iri Rc.No.145/2011-C, dated 30.4.2012 on the file of the 1®* respondent and consequential proceedings dated 29.6.2012 on the file of the 2 respondent is illegal, arbitrary, without jurisdiction and malafide one and the same are liable to be set aside. / one nd I.A. NO: 1 OF 2012fWPMP. NO: 26136 OF 2012) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstanced stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the proceedings in Rc.No.145/2011-C, dated 30.4.2012 on the file of the 1®‘ respondent and consequential proceedings j dated 29.6.2012 on the file of the 2nd respondent by directing to continue the petitioner in service as Chief Executive Officer of the 2"^^ respondent Society, pending disposal of the writ petition, pounsel for the Petitioner: SRI V. V. N. NARAYANA RAO Counsel for the Respondent No.1: GP FOR COOPERATION Counsel for the Respondent No.2:— The Court made the following: ORDER APHC010198852012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] TUESDAY. THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 20380/2012 Between: A.Bhaskara Rao, ...PETITIONER AND The Deputy Registrar Of Cooperative Societies and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.VVN NARAYANA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR COOPERATION The Court made the following: r THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION No.20380 OF 2012 ORDER: 1. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication. 2. Recording the said submission, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. 3. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand closed. / ^/.p VINOD KUMAR I assistANTREP^^T*^^*^; SECTI<5n OFFICE!^ //TRUE COPY// To, 1. One CC to Sri V. V. N. Narayana Rao, Advocate [OPUC] 2. Two CCs to GP for Cooperation, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] 3. Three CD Copies. ssb vr HIGH COURT DATED;25/02/2025 of anohs■12 ORDER 5 0^AUG20?5 m WP.No.20380 of 2012 ^ . Current beciion ^ DISMISSING THE W.P. AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS