MAHAVEER PRASAD MEENA SON OF SHRI GANGA RAM v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/18459/2025 · 2025-12-02
Ashok Kumar Jain
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 46626 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 46626 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:49213] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 18459/2025
1. Mahaveer Prasad Meena Son Of Shri Ganga Ram, Aged About 39 Years, Resident Of House No. 105, Shiv Colony, Dev Pura, Bundi, District Bundi, (Raj.). Constable Armorer, No. 761, Present Posting Constable Armorar, Reserve Police Line, Bundi.
2. Mahaveer Prasad Rawal Son Of Shri Devi Lal, Aged About 48 Years, Resident Of Quarter No. G-1, (E-Block), Reserve Police Line, Bundi, District Bundi, (Raj.). Head Constable Band No. 217, Present Posting Reserve Police Line, Bundi.
3. Satya Narayan Meena Son Of Shri Moti Lal Meena, Aged About 47 Years, Resident Of Village Bahadurpura, Post Matunda, District Bundi, (Raj.). Constable Band No. 608, Present Posting Armorer Branch, Reserve Police Line, Bundi.
4. Moti Lal Son Of Shri Amar Lal, Resident Of Quarter No. E- 2, Reserve Police Line Bara, District Bara, (Raj.). Constable Band No. 359, Present Posting Constable Band, Reserve Police Line, Bara. ----Petitioners Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary To The Government, Department Of Finance (Rules), Government Of Rajasthan, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.).
2. Secretary (Home), Ministry Of Home Affairs, Government Of Rajasthan, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur, (Raj.).
3. Director General Of Police, Rajasthan, Police Head Quarter, Jaipur, (Raj.).
4. Superintendent Of Police, Bundi (Raj.).
5. Superintendent Of Police, Bara (Raj.). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sunil Kumar Saini For Respondent(s) : Mr. Parth Sharma and Ms. Devkriti Vashisth for Mr. Bhuwnesh Sharma, AAG
[2025:RJ-JP:49213] (2 of 3) [CW-18459/2025] HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN
Order 02/12/2025
1. Instant writ petition is preferred by petitioners with following prayer:-
“(i). By an appropriate writ order and direction of respondents in granting the petitioners the second selection grade on completion of 18 years of service of the post of Assistant Sub Inspector of Police may be directed to release in favour of the petitioners on account of grant of second selection grade the pay of the post of Sub-Inspector, with all consequential benefits viz, pay fixation on the post of Sub Inspector, arrears of salary further promotion etc. (ii). Issue any other writ order or direction, which this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper, may kindly be passed in favour of the petitioners. (iii) Cost of the writ petition be also awarded in favour of the petitioners.”
2.
Learned counsel for petitioners while referring and relying upon order dated 07.10.2025 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.14545/2025 (Shaitan Singh Vs. The State of Rajasthan and Ors.) submits that the controversy and the issue raised herein is already settled by this Hon’ble Court, and instant writ petition be disposed of in accordance with principle of law as laid down in case of Amar Singh & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. (S.B. CWP No.3873/2019).
3. Mr. Parth Sharma for Mr. Bhuwnesh Sharma, AAG accepts notice. Office is directed to reflect name of Mr. Bhuwnesh Sharma, AAG as counsel for the respondents.
4. Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for petitioners and also material placed on record, the writ petition may be disposed in light of Shaitan Singh Vs. The
[2025:RJ-JP:49213] (3 of 3) [CW-18459/2025] State of Rajasthan and Ors. and Amar Singh & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. (supra) passed by this Court.
5. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioners are given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents-Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to decide the representation in light of ratio laid down in cases referred hereinabove but in case of deviation with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After the decision, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the
order to the petitioners either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioners have provided E-mail in their representation. If the petitioners are still aggrieved, they have a liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition.
6. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of.
(ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J MR/180