IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA 330 PARMINDER SINGH @ TINKU AND OTHERS STATE OF PUNJAB CORAM: Present: MANJARI NEHRU KAUL, J. (ORAL) 1. Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 dated 22.05.2023, under Sections 307, 341, 294, 149 of IPC and Sections 25, 54, 59 of Arms Act (Section 307 IPC and Sections 25, 54, 5 deleted lateron), registered at Police Station Zirakpur, District Mohali (Annexure P on the basis of compromise dated 07.06.2023 (Annexure P 2. directed to appear before the learned trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate on 29.05.2025 to get their statements recorded regarding the compromise arrived at, between them. 3. Ist Class, Dera Bassi the factum of the compromise arrived at between the parties stands verified IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM- Date of decision: PARMINDER SINGH @ TINKU AND OTHERS Versus PUNJAB AND ANOTHER HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANJARI NEHRU KAUL Mr. R.S. Attri, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Sahil Chaudhary, AAG, Punjab. None for respondent No.2. MANJARI NEHRU KAUL, J. (ORAL) Prayer in the instant petition Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 is for quashing of dated 22.05.2023, under Sections 307, 341, 294, 149 of IPC and Sections 25, 54, 59 of Arms Act (Section 307 IPC and Sections 25, 54, 5 deleted lateron), registered at Police Station Zirakpur, District Mohali (Annexure P-1) and all other consequential proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise dated 07.06.2023 (Annexure P Vide order dated 30.04.2025 of directed to appear before the learned trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate on .05.2025 to get their statements recorded regarding the compromise arrived at, between them. Report has since been received from learned Judicial Mag Dera Bassi, in pursuance of the directions of this Court, wherein the factum of the compromise arrived at between the parties stands verified IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -M-22866-2025 Date of decision: July 09, 2025 PARMINDER SINGH @ TINKU AND OTHERS ...Petitioner ...Respondents HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANJARI NEHRU KAUL Mr. Sahil Chaudhary, AAG, Punjab. the instant petition filed under Section 528 of is for quashing of FIR No.0144, dated 22.05.2023, under Sections 307, 341, 294, 149 of IPC and Sections 25, 54, 59 of Arms Act (Section 307 IPC and Sections 25, 54, 59 of Arms Act deleted lateron), registered at Police Station Zirakpur, District Mohali 1) and all other consequential proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise dated 07.06.2023 (Annexure P-2). .04.2025 of this Court, the parties were directed to appear before the learned trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate on .05.2025 to get their statements recorded regarding the compromise Report has since been received from learned Judicial Magistrate , in pursuance of the directions of this Court, wherein the factum of the compromise arrived at between the parties stands verified ...Petitioner ...Respondents filed under Section 528 of FIR No.0144, dated 22.05.2023, under Sections 307, 341, 294, 149 of IPC and Sections 25, 9 of Arms Act deleted lateron), registered at Police Station Zirakpur, District Mohali 1) and all other consequential proceedings arising therefrom, this Court, the parties were directed to appear before the learned trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate on .05.2025 to get their statements recorded regarding the compromise istrate , in pursuance of the directions of this Court, wherein the factum of the compromise arrived at between the parties stands verified Jaspreet Kaur 2025.07.10 11:01 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh CRM-M-22866 and confirmed. As per the report, compromise has indeed between the parties and the same is without any pressure or coercion and out of their free will, and the complainant has also made statement to the effect that he would have no objection if the FIR qua the accused quashed. 4. the parties, along with its report. 5. accused other than the petitioner person in the FIR 6. principles laid down by the Hon’ble Apex Court in Punjab and others (2012) 10 SCC 303 Court in Kulwinder Singh and 2007(3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 FIR and all consequential proceedings arising out of it, are quashed. 7. compromise and their statements recorded before the Court below. July 09, 2025 Jaspreet Kaur 22866-2025 confirmed. As per the report, compromise has indeed between the parties and the same is without any pressure or coercion and out of their free will, and the complainant has also made statement to the effect that he would have no objection if the FIR qua the accused The trial Court has annexed photocopies of the parties, along with its report. Learned State counsel too submits that there are no other accused other than the petitioners and respondent No.2 is the only aggrieved person in the FIR in question. In view of the report of the learned trial Court, and the principles laid down by the Hon’ble Apex Court in Punjab and others (2012) 10 SCC 303, and also by the Full Bench of this Kulwinder Singh and others Vs. State of Punjab and another, 2007(3) RCR (Criminal) 1052, the instant petition is allowed. The aforesaid FIR and all consequential proceedings arising out of it, are quashed. Needless to say the parties shall remain bound by the terms of compromise and their statements recorded before the Court below. July 09, 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable -2- confirmed. As per the report, compromise has indeed been effected between the parties and the same is without any pressure or coercion and out of their free will, and the complainant has also made statement to the effect that he would have no objection if the FIR qua the accused-petitioners is photocopies of the statements of Learned State counsel too submits that there are no other and respondent No.2 is the only aggrieved In view of the report of the learned trial Court, and the principles laid down by the Hon’ble Apex Court in Gian Singh Vs. State of , and also by the Full Bench of this others Vs. State of Punjab and another, , the instant petition is allowed. The aforesaid FIR and all consequential proceedings arising out of it, are quashed. Needless to say the parties shall remain bound by the terms of compromise and their statements recorded before the Court below. (MANJARI NEHRU KAUL) JUDGE : Yes/No : Yes/No been effected between the parties and the same is without any pressure or coercion and out of their free will, and the complainant has also made statement to the effect is the statements of Learned State counsel too submits that there are no other and respondent No.2 is the only aggrieved In view of the report of the learned trial Court, and the Gian Singh Vs. State of , and also by the Full Bench of this others Vs. State of Punjab and another, , the instant petition is allowed. The aforesaid Needless to say the parties shall remain bound by the terms of Jaspreet Kaur 2025.07.10 11:01 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh