Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 46607 (RAJ)

THAR HATHKARGHA AVAM HASTHKALA UTPADAK SAHKARI SAMITI LTD. v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/11406/2020 · 2025-11-25

Anand Sharma

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:47749] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.11406/2020 Thar Hathkargha Avam Hasthkala Utpadak Sahkari Samiti Ltd., Registered Address Plot No. 81, S.V. Vihar Colony, New Sanganer Road, Jaipur (Raj.) through its Manager Laiq Ahmed Ansari S/o Sh. Rafiq Ahmed aged about 55 Years, R/o 560, Vivek Vihar, Shyam Nagar, Jaipur (Raj.). ----Petitioner Versus 1. State of Rajasthan through its Secretary, Department of Medical and Health, Government of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Superintendent, Associated Group of Hospital, Ajmer, Jawahar Lal Nehru Medical College, Ajmer (Raj.). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Prem Prakash Bhunkar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Archit Bohra, AGC HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 25/11/2025 1. By way of filing this writ petition, petitioner has challenged the order dated 25.07.2020, whereby the bid submitted by the petitioner has been rejected by the respondents. He has further prayed for accepting his bid and to grant work order pursuant to notice inviting E-bid No.14/Acctt.8/JLNH/2020 dated 08.04.2020. 2. At the outset, learned Government Counsel submits that tender in question dated 08.04.2020 has been cancelled by the respondents and they have not proceeded further to issue any work order in respect of the said tender. [2025:RJ-JP:47749] (2 of 2) [CW-11406/2020] 3. In view of the statements made by the learned Government Counsel, no cause of action for pursuing the instant writ petition survives and the same has become infructuous. 4. Accordingly, the present writ petition stands dismissed as having become infructuous. 5. As regard grievance of the petitioner in respect of refund of earnest money, if any, he shall make a representation before the respondents and, in case, it is legally permissible, the respondents shall take necessary action accordingly. (ANAND SHARMA),J DAKSH/70