RADHEY SHYAM PRASAD v. STATE OF U.P. THRU SECY SECONDARY EDUCATION AND OTHERS
SPLA/363/2009 · 2025-09-09
Anish Kumar Gupta, Mahesh Chandra Tripathi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 46606 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 46606 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD SPECIAL APPEAL No. - 363 of 2009 Court No. - 29 HON'BLE MAHESH CHANDRA TRIPATHI, J.
HON'BLE ANISH KUMAR GUPTA, J.
1. On 03.09.2025, the following order was passed in the instant matter:
"1. The instant appeal is pending since 2009.
2. Even in the revised call, learned counsel for the appellant is not present.
3. List peremptorily in the next cause list."
2. Today again, when the matter was taken up in the revised list, none appeared on behalf of the petitioner to press the petition, nor has any adjournment slip been moved. Learned counsel for the respondents is present.
3. In the absence of any effective representation, it appears that the cause of action has become stale and the writ petition has been rendered infructuous by efflux of time.
4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
5. In case the petitioner feels that the matter still survives, liberty is granted to him to move an application for recalling this order within six weeks from today.
September 10, 2025 NLY Versus Counsel for Appellant(s) : M.M. Sahai Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., T.N. Tiwari (Anish Kumar Gupta,J.) (Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.) Radhey Shyam Prasad .....Appellant(s) State Of U.P. Thru Secy Secondary Education And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- NAND LAL YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad