$~106 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RFA(OS) 23/2025 M/S OCKLEAF DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD. .....Appellant Through: Mr.Ashok Gurnami, Dr.Manish Aggarwal, Ms.Priyanka Verma, Mr.Amit Ambawat, Ms.Sheena Sukhija, Mr.Abhishek Singh & Ms.Anoushka Bhattacharya, Advs. versus RAM AVTAR AGGARWAL (DECEASED) THROUGH LRS & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr.Suhail Khan, Mr.Farid Ahmed Nizami , Mr.Vishal Raj Sehijpal & Ms.Vratika Mittal, Advs. for R-1 & R-2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RENU BHATNAGAR O R D E R % 29.04.2025 CM APPL. 25319/2025 (Exemption) 1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. RFA(OS) 23/2025 & CM APPL. 25320/2025, CM APPL. 25321/2025, CM APPL. 25322/2025 2. This appeal has been filed challenging the Judgment dated 16.12.2024 passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court in CS(OS) 229/2023. 3. The learned counsel for the respondent nos.1 and 2, who This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/07/2025 at 17:37:06 appears on advance notice of this appeal, challenges the very maintainability of the present appeal by contending that the name of the appellant company has been struck off from the Registrar of Companies vide Notice dated 08.08.2018. He submits that, therefore, there is no company in existence in the name of the appellant as on today. 4. The learned counsel for the appellant, on the other hand, submits that the order of striking off of the name of the company from the Registrar of Companies has been challenged in the form of an appeal, which is pending adjudication before the learned National Company Law Tribunal (‘NCLT’). He submits that the appeal be adjourned sine die, awaiting the outcome of the said appeal. 5. We are not impressed with the submissions made by the learned counsel for the appellant. As on today, there is no company by the name of the appellant, therefore, the appeal is not maintainable. In case, the appellant is to succeed in its appeal before the learned NCLT, it shall be open to the appellant to revive this appeal. 6. For the present, the appeal along with the pending applications, is dismissed as being not maintainable. NAVIN CHAWLA, J RENU BHATNAGAR, J APRIL 29, 2025/sg/SJ Click here to check corrigendum, if any This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/07/2025 at 17:37:06