Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 46602 (AP)

Pothuraju Krishna Murthi v. The state of Andhra Pradesh

WP/26030/2025 · 2025-09-24

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010479842025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 26030/2025 Between: 1. POTHURAJU KRISHNA MURTHI, S/O VENKAIAH, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS R/O.2-30, GUDIVADA, TENALI MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH 3. SUBINSPECTOR OF POLICE, TENALI RURAL POLICE STATION, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 4. NARRA SRINIVAS RAO, S/O.VENKATA SUBBAIAH AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS R/O. DOOR NO. 1-15/A/A, THUMMAPUDI VILLAGE DUGGIRALA MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT ANDHRA PRADESH. 5. KARETI SRINIVAS RAO, S/O. KARETIPUNNAIAH AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS R/O. DOOR NO. 1-21-7, HINDUPREMAMANDALI, NAZAEPETA, TENALI TOWN, GUNTUR DISTRICT ANDHRA PRADESH. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. RAYALA BHAGYA RAJA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ order or orders declaring the inaction of the 2nd and 3rd respondents in not registering the criminal complaint dated. 02.07.2025 as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional, and 2 consequently direct the respondent no.2 and 3 to register the criminal complaint dated.02.07.2025.” 2. Sri Md.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on instructions, would submit that they have not registered any crime since the disputes between the parties are purely civil in nature. 3. Recording the said submissions, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the Petitioner is at liberty to work out his remedies before appropriate forum in accordance with law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:25.09.2025 ASR 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.26030 of 2025 Dt.25.09.2025 Asr