1 | P a g e IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C). No. 23782 of 2025 Deepankar Mohapatra `…. Petitioner Represented by Mr. A.Pattanaik, Advocate -Versus - State of Odisha and Ors …. Opposite Parties Represented by Mr. S.S.Routray, ASC CORAM: JUSTICE SASHIKANTA MISHRA ORDER_ 28.01.2026 1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode. 2. The petitioner is aggrieved by issuance of mutation R.O.R. on 30.12.2023, wherein the extent of land is said to have been reduced. 3. Since the R.O.R. is said to have been published pursuant to mutation proceeding, the petitioner can avail the remedy of appeal. 4. The writ application is therefore, disposed of leaving it open to the petitioner to prefer an appeal before the appellate authority within fifteen days. If such appeal is preferred along with application for condonation of delay, the appellate authority shall consider the same in accordance with law. (Sashikanta Mishra) Judge Deepak Order No. 01.