Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 4660 (JHR)

SHAHINA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

WPC/934/2025 · 2025-08-14

Rajesh Kumar

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:23790 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No. 934 of 2025 Shahina, aged about 57 years, daughter of Sri Haji Abdul Bari, resident of House No. 35/A, Hathi Khana, Near Kali Mandir, P.O. & P.S. Doranda, District- Ranchi-2 ….........Petitioner(s) Vrs. 1.The State of Jharkhand 2.The Branch Manager, State Bank of India, Doranda Branch, P.O. & P.S.- Doranda, District-Ranchi 3.The Deputy Branch Manager, State Bank of India, Doranda Branch, P.O.& P.S.- Doranda, District- Ranchi 4.The Office of RBI Ombudsman through its Chairman, Reserve Bank of India, Fourth Floor, Pragati Sadan, RRDA Building, Kutchery Chowk, P.O. & P.S.- Kutchery, District- Ranchi .......... Respondent(s) ….... CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR For the Petitioner : Mr. Vincent Rohit Marki, Advocate For the Resp.-Bank : Mr. P.A.S. Pati, Advocate 04/14.08.2025 Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the present writ petition has become infructuous and he has instruction from the client not to pursue the case. 2. Learned counsel for the respondent has no objection. 3. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. (Rajesh Kumar, J.) A.Mohanty