Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 4660 (BOM)

ICICI Home Finance Company Limited v. Sushilabai Ranjit Rathod

ARBP/494/2025 · 2026-09-16

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

42-ARBP-494-2025.doc Vivekanand IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 494 OF 2025 ICICI Home Finance Company Limited … Petitioner V/s. Sushilabai Ranjit Rathod … Respondent Mr. Nikhil Rajani i/b M/s. V. Deshpande & Co., for the Petitioner. CORAM : AMIT BORKAR, J. DATED : SEPTEMBER 16, 2026 P.C.: 1. This Court has already granted ad-interim relief in terms of prayer clause (c). It appears that, the order of injunction is in respect of the mortgaged property. 2. Since, the petitioner is sufficiently protected by grant reliefs in terms of prayer clause (c) of the Petition. For the rests prayers, it shall be open for Petitioner to apply before the Arbitrator under Section 17 of the Act. 3. Keeping all questions open to be agitated before the Arbitrator, the present petition stands disposed of by confirming relief in terms of prayer clause (c). (AMIT BORKAR, J.) 1 VIVEKANAND RAJENDRA BONDE Digitally signed by VIVEKANAND RAJENDRA BONDE Date: 2026.09.16 18:10:26 +0530