[2025:RJ-JP:40320] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 11973/2025 Saddam Hussain S/o Mahrajudeen, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Mohallan Mridagan B-13, Chandpur Ki Chungi, Biznor, Police Station Kotwali, Bijnor, Presently Resident Of Mani Manjara, Sector-13, House No. 988/3 Chandigarh, Police Station, Mani Manjara, Chandigarh. (Presently Confined In Sub Jail, Sambhar Lake, District Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 12161/2025 1. Deshraj S/o Gyanchand, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Sahanali, Police Station Darla Ghat, District Solan Himachal Pradesh. (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Sambharlake). 2. Sunil S/o Late Sh. Rajendra Kumar, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Pandova, Police Station Suni Post Office Ugli, District Shimla, Himachal Pradesh. (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Sambharlake). ----Petitioners Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajneesh Gupta with Mr. Rahul Sharma Mr. Arpit Srivastava For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 06/10/2025 1. The petitioners have preferred these bail applications under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.154/2025 registered at Police [2025:RJ-JP:40320] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-11973/2025] Station Mokhampura, District-Jaipur Rural for offences under Sections 19, 54 and 54(A) of Rajasthan Excise Act. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in these cases. He further submits that though there is an allegation against the petitioners of being in possession of 8,000 bottles of illegal liquor but there are no criminal antecedents against any of the petitioners. The petitioner- Saddam Hussain is in custody since 23.08.2025, and the other co- accused are behind the bars since 17.08.2025. No custodial interrogation or recovery is warranted. The trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioners in further custody, hence, the bail applications of the petitioners may be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail applications. 5. On consideration of the rival submission and material available on record and deliberating all the facts and circumstances of the case, and without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioners. 6. Accordingly, the bail applications under Section 483 B.N.S.S. are allowed and it is ordered that the petitioners-Saddam Hussain S/o Mahrajudeen, Deshraj S/o Gyanchand and Sunil S/o Late Sh. Rajendra Kumar shall be released on bail on their furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each of them to the satisfaction of the [2025:RJ-JP:40320] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-11973/2025] learned trial court for their appearance before that Court on all the dates till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Arun/154-155