Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 46594 (CHH)

NEELKANTH BHARTI @ CHHOTU v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

MCRC/9135/2024 · 2025-01-10

Shri Arvind Kumar Verma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 / 2 2025:CGHC:1840 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCRC No. 9135 of 2024 1 - Neelkanth Bharti @ Chhotu S/o Manohar Bharti Aged About 20 Years Resident Of Village Nagpura, Tahsil And Police Station Baloda, District Janjgir-Champa Chhattisgarh ... Applicant versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer, Police Station Baloda, District - Janjgir-Champa Chhattisgarh ... Respondent For Applicant : Mr. Ashok Dixit, Advocate For State : Ms. Priya Sharma, PL (Hon’ble Shri Justice Arvind Kumar Verma) Order on Board 10/01/2025 1. This is the first bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Shuraksha Sanhita for grant of regular bail to the applicant who has been arrested on 16/02/2024 in connection with Crime No. 82/2024, registered at Police Station Baloda, District Janjgir-Champa C.G. for the offence punishable under Section 302 of the IPC. ASHUTOSH MISHRA Digitally signed by ASHUTOSH MISHRA Date: 2025.01.14 13:42:28 +0530 2 / 2 2. As per the prosecution case the complainant has given an information to the concerned police station that on the date of incident the applicant has assaulted his uncle by way of wooden stick and the police had registered a merg report and then the FIR was registered. Thereafter, the present applicant was arrested. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant would submit that the false FIR has been registered because of old family dispute. He would next contend that the applicant has been implicated on the basis of suspicion. He would lastly contend that the applicant is in jail since 16/02/2024 and the charge-sheet in this case has been filed, therefore, the applicant may be released on bail. 4. Per contra, learned State counsel opposes the prayer for grant of bail. 5. I have learned counsel for the parties and perused the documents. 6. Perusal of the documents would show that on the basis of the memorandum of the applicant a blood stained club was seized and the FSL report is also positive. Therefore, considering the entire facts & circumstances of the case and looking the seriousness and gravity of the offence, I am not inclined to release the applicant on bail. 7. Accordingly, the bail application is rejected. SD/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) JUDGE ashu