HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 67388 of 2013 Court No. - 40 HON'BLE SARAL SRIVASTAVA, J. HON'BLE SUDHANSHU CHAUHAN, J. Sri Anil Kumar Chaudhary, learned counsel for the petitioners states that no cause of action survives in the writ petition and same has become infructuous. Consequently, writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. October 8, 2025 Sattyarth Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anil Kumar Chaudhary, Manish Chandra Tiwari Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Sudhanshu Chauhan,J.) (Saral Srivastava,J.) Doma Ram Sahni And 4 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SATTYARTH ANAND High Court of Judicature at Allahabad