Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 46579 (ALL)

BHANU PRATAP v. STATE OF U.P. AND 11 OTHERS

WRIB/1520/2025 · 2025-05-26

Chandra Kumar Rai

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:90546 Court No. - 50 Case :- WRIT - B No. - 1520 of 2025 Petitioner :- Bhanu Pratap Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 11 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Shitala Sahay Srivastav,Sudhir Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Chandra Kumar Rai,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Ashutosh Kumar Rai, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State-respondents. 2. The instant petition has been filed for the following relief: "issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing to respondent no.2 to decide / expedite the Appeal No.269/ 334 having Computerized Case No.201054143600001974 (Ramdular vs. Bhanu Pratap) under Section 109A (3) of the U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953 within stipulated period." 3. This Court vide order dated 16.5.2025 directed the learned Standing Counsel to obtain instruction in the matter. 4. In compliance of the order of this Court, instruction dated 23.5.2025 sent by Settlement Officer of Consolidation, Jaunpur is taken on record. 5. Mr. Ashutosh Kumar Rai, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State on the basis of instruction submitted that today is the date fixed in appeal and matter shall be disposed of in accordance with law expeditiously. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the instant petition is finally disposed of directing respondent no.2 to decide the aforementioned appeal in accordance with law after affording proper opportunity of hearing to the parties, expeditiously preferably within a period of two months from the date of production of certified copy of this order before him. Order Date :- 27.5.2025 Rameez Digitally signed by :- RAMEEZ AHMED High Court of Judicature at Allahabad