APHC010032212010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] WEDNESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 13761/2010 Between: 1. BASHA INDANE, REP. BY ITS PROPRIETRIX SMT, SYED BEE BASHA W/O. M.S. KHALANDAR BASHA, 35 YRS INDANE GAS DISTRIBUTOR R/O PORUMAMILLA VILLAGE, KADAPA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE UNION OF INDIA, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF PETROLEUM AND NATURAL GAS , CENTRAL SECRETARIAT, NEW DELHI 2. M/S INDIAN OIL CORPORATIOIN LIMITED, REP. BY ITS EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR LPG INDIAN AREA OFFICE, 3-6-346 TO 438 2ND FLOOR NASPUR HOUSE, HIMAYATHNAGAR, HYDERABAD ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue any appropriate writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action the respondent in appointing new RGGLV distributors at Avadhoota Kasinaine & Brahmangari Matham Villages of Kadapa District vide Notification dt. 30-3-2010 is in violation of the Policy Guidelines of the respondent and the police guidelines as approved by the Government of India in their Letter No. P-20020/22/2009 - Mkt dt. 6th August 2009 for RGGLV scheme and further declare that the said action is violative of Art. 14 & 19 (1)(g) of the Constitution of India and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2010(WPMP 17338 OF 2010 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to appoint the LPG Distributors U/RGGLV Scheme within the petitioner’s area of operation pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass IA NO: 4 OF 2010(WPMP 74876 OF 2010 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P V A PADMANABHAM Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. N V RAMANUJAM(SC FOR CENTRAL GOVT ) 2. THOOM SRINIVAS 3. SAI SANJAY SURANENI 4. HARINATH N (DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA) 5. ELEVATED AS JUDGE The Court made the following ORDER: Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication. Recording the submission of learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Date: 10.09.2025 KAS