Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 46571 (AP)

Rasigolla Subbarayudu v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/23976/2025 · 2025-09-22

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010455632025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 23976/2025 Between: 1. RASIGOLLA SUBBARAYUDU, S/O R.C. SUBBARAYUDU AGED- 35 YEARS.OCC.SOFTWARE R/O D.NO 4/363-1,G.V.SATRAM VILLAGE NANDYALAMPETA POST .MYDUKUR MANDAL KADAPA.DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE D G P, MANGALAGIRI .GUNTUR DISTRICT 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE S P, KADAPA DISTRICT. 4. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ITOWN.U/G.PS (RAMAKRISHNA) KADAPA POLICE STATION.KADAPA. DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature f a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents in not change the investigation officer (io) in My Complaint as illegal arbitrary violation of the Rules is illegal arbitrary Whereby Where under the petitioner submitted by the 3rd respondent on 11-7-2025 as Highly illegal arbitrary in violation of Article 14 and 21 Of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 2 Respondents to change the investigation officer due to my Life and death condition and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents to change the investigation officer by the respondents to consider the petitioner representation on 11- 07-2025 pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. KRISHNA RAO M Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 3 The Court made the following : ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer: “…..to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents in not change the investigation officer (io) in My Complaint as illegal, arbitrary violation of the Rules is illegal arbitrary Whereby Where under the petitioner submitted by the 3rd respondent on 11.07.2025 as Highly illegal, arbitrary in violation of Article 14 and 21 Of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondents to change the investigation officer due to my Life and death condition and pass……” 2. Sri M.Krishna Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that petitioner wants to not press the writ petition. 3. Sri V.Farook, Learned Assistant Government Pleader is in attendance. 4. Recording the submission made, the Writ Petition is dismissed as not pressed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATAJYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 23.09.2025 SNI 4 632 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATAJYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.23976 of 2025 Dated.23.09.2025 SNI