1 971..odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5071 OF 2025 IN FAST/13980/2025 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5073 OF 2025 IN FAST/13992/2025 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5072 OF 2025 IN FAST/13989/2025 AMBADAS SHRIPATI SUPEKAR VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR ... Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Thorat Nanabhau R. AGP for Respondent No. 1 : Ms. Vaishali Chaudhari … CORAM : MANJUSHA DESHPANDE, J. DATE : 11th SEPTEMBER, 2026 PER COURT : 1. All these Applications have been filed by the respective Applicants for condonation of delay for filing the Appeal against the judgment and order passed by the reference Court. There is a delay of 1056 days. 2. Learned AGP appears for Respondent no. 1. Respondent no. 2 though served, nobody has caused appearance for him. 3. The reasons for delay has been explained satisfactorily by the Claimants. The delay is neither intentional nor deliberate. Therefore, 2026:BHC-AUG:42277 2 971..odt the delay occurred in filing the Appeals deserves to be condoned subject to the condition that the Claimants shall furnish an undertaking to the Registrar (Judicial) of this Court that they will not claim any statutory benefit and interest for the delayed period. 3. Civil Applications are allowed in terms of prayer clause 'B' and stand disposed of. ( MANJUSHA DESHPANDE, J. ) SPC