TILAK RAJ v. U T OF J AND K TH SECRETARY COOPERATIVES DEPTT AND OTHERS
WP(C)/2511/2023 · 2025-04-11
Wasim Sadiq Nargal
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 4656 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 4656 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
Case: WP(C) No. 2511/2023
Tilak Raj
..... Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through :- Mr. Anuj Malhotra, Advocate
Vs
U.T. of J&K and Ors. .....Respondent(s)
Through :- None.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE
ORDER 11.04.2025
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that with the efflux of time, the instant petition has been rendered infructuous and he has instructions from his client not to pursue the matter any further. His statement is taken on record.
In view of the statement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the instant petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous.
Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated.
(WASIM SADIQ NARGAL)
JUDGE
JAMMU 11.04.2025 Mihul
Sr. No. 61