Page No.# 1/4 GAHC040008212024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/18/2024 Bote Yuto and 3 Ors Son of Late Toduk Yuto, permanent resident of Tato Village, PO and PS Tato, Shri Yomi District, Arunachal Pradesh 2: Mame Rida Age: Occupation : Son of Shri Tama Rida resident of Tato Village PO and PS Tato Shri Yomi District Arunachal Pradesh 3: Tasen Puying Age: Occupation : Son of Shri Tame Puying permanent resident of Tato Village PO and PS Tato Shri Yomi District Arunachal Pradesh 4: Jimmy Hanggo Age: Occupation : Son of Shri T Hanggo resident of Tato Village PO and PS Tato Shri Yomi District Arunachal Prades Page No.# 2/4 VERSUS Liyi Bagra and 5 Ors working as Deputy Commissioner, Shri Yomi District, Tato, PO and PS Tato, Arunachal Pradesh 2:Takam Titus Age: 0 Occupation : Working as District Land and Revenue Settlement Officer District Shi Yomi Tato PO and PS Tato Arunachal Pradesh. 3:Puna Hinda Age: 0 Occupation : Proprietor of M/s Puna Hinda C/o Time Library Akash Deep Ganga Market Itanagar PO and PS Itanagar Papumpare District Arunachal Pradesh 4:Rajkumar Kairi Age: 0 Occupation : Son of Shri Hari Narayan Kairi Project Manager M/s Puna Hinda C/o Time Library Akash Deep Ganga Market Itanagar PO and PS Itanagar Papumpare District Arunachal Pradesh 5:B P S Tomar Age: 0 Occupation : Officer Commanding 92 RCC (GREF) Pin 930092 C/o 99 APO HQ Page No.# 3/4 Thumbin PO and PS Kaying Siang District Arunachal Pradesh. 6:C S Belchandan Age: 0 Occupation : Commandant 92 RCC (GREF) Pin 930092 C/o 99 APO HQ Thumbin PO and PS Kaying Siang District Arunachal Pradesh Advocate for the Petitioner : Nikita Danggen, Penjom Siga,K Gao,Rubu Tani,Honi Tana Tara,K Chotton,Oken Duggong Advocate for the Respondent : Takam Sunil, Yasmin Gao,Mepe Ete,Nyali Sora,Marto Kato BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANASH RANJAN PATHAK ORDER Date : 30-04-2025 Heard Ms. N. Danggen, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Ms. M. Yaram, learned counsel for the respondent Nos. 1 & 2 and Mr. M. Kato, learned DSGI appearing for the respondent Nos. 5 & 6. On instructions of the petitioners, Ms. N. Danggen, learned counsel is nor pressing this contempt petition. Accordingly, this contempt petition stands dismissed being not pressed. The notice of contempt issued to the respondents earlier on 28.06.2024 is Page No.# 4/4 hereby recalled. JUDGE Comparing Assistant