IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 112 CWP-10761-2025 Date of Decision: 11.04.2025 Roshan Lal Sharma ....Petitioner Versus Union of India and another ....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS SURI ---- Present: Mr. S.K.Malik, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Indresh Goel, Advocae for the respondents. **** VIKAS SURI, J. (Oral) 1. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that pursuant to the impugned order dated 12.03.2025 (Annexure P-1), the petitioner has been relieved today itself and the petitioner desires to challenge the same. Thus, he prays that the competent authority in seisin of the representation dated 18.03.2025 (Annexure P-5) be directed to dispose of the same in a time bound manner and the petitioner be permitted to withdraw the present petition with liberty to challenge the relieving order. 2. Having been served an advance copy of the writ petition, Mr. Indresh Goel, Senior Panel Counsel, puts in appearance on behalf of the respondents and waives service. He submits that the representation dated 18.03.2025 (Annexure P-5) would be lawfully disposed of by the competent authority within the time frame that may be stipulated by the Court. VARINDER PRASHAD 2025.04.11 17:36 I attest to the accuracy of this order/judgment PHHC CWP-10761-2025 -2- 3. In view of the aforesaid and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the present petition is ordered to be dismissed as withdrawn with liberty aforesaid. 4. However, in the light of the submission noticed hereinbefore, the competent authority would decide the representation (Annexure P-5), within a period of three weeks from today, by passing a speaking order, in accordance with law. 5. Disposed of accordingly. (VIKAS SURI) April 11, 2025 JUDGE Varinder Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No VARINDER PRASHAD 2025.04.11 17:36 I attest to the accuracy of this order/judgment PHHC