SMT.BETHALA PRAMEELA RANI v. SRI BETHALA RAJESH BABU
FCA/67/2008 · 2025-09-23
A Hari Haranadha Sarma, Battu Devanand
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 46554 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 46554 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010173722008
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3545] WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA FAMILY COURT APPEAL (FCA) NO: 67/2008 Between:
1. SMT.BETHALA PRAMEELA RANI, W/O.B.RAJESH BABU, CHRISTIAN HOUSEWIIFE R/O.PHILHOUSEPETA, EASTERN STREET, ELURU, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT.
...APPELLANT AND
1. SRI BETHALA RAJESH BABU, S/o.Prasad, Christian Carpenter R/o.20- 11/10, Philhousepeta, Eastern Street, Eluru,
...RESPONDENT Appeal under section________ against orders IA NO: 1 OF 2005(FCAMP 58 OF 2005 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased condone the dealy of 157 days in filing the above appeal IA NO: 2 OF 2005(FCAMP 70 OF 2005 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the judgment and decree in OP.No. 698/2002 on the file of the Principal District Judge, at Eluru, West Godavari District dt. 29.7.2004 Counsel for the Appellant:
1. T VIDYA RANI Counsel for the Respondent:
2
1. The Court made the following:
3
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND & THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA
FAMILY COURT APPEAL No.67 of 2008 JUDGMENT:(Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Battu Devanand)
On 13.08.2025, there was no representation for the appellant. Accordingly, this appeal was posted to 03.09.2025 under the caption 8for dismissal9. It was again listed on 10.09.2025. On that day also, there was no representation for the appellant. Again, it was posted to today. Today also, there is no representation. Hence, it appears that the appellant has no interest to prosecute the case.
2. Accordingly, the Family Court Appeal is dismissed for non- prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
__________________________ JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND
__________________________________ JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA Date:24.09.2025 SCS
4
166
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND & THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA
FAMILY COURT APPEAL No.67 of 2008
Dt.24.09.2025 SCS