Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 4655 (KAR)

SRI ANAND S/O HALAGAPPA KARLAKUNTI v. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR

WP/101827/2025 · 2025-04-24

Jyoti Mulimani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:6809 WP No. 101827 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF APRIL, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 101827 OF 2025 (S-RES) BETWEEN: SRI. ANAND S/O HALAGAPPA KARLAKUNTI, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, WORKING AS ASSISTANT ENGINEER (GRADE-I), KARNATAKA RURAL INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT LTD., HOOVINAHADAGALI, R/O: NANDA GOKUL HERITAGE, NAVYAS ELITE, BEHIND ANAND SINGH HOUSE, HOSAPETE, VIJAYANAGAR DISTRICT. … PETITIONER (BY SRI. S.S. CHALAWADI AND SRI. KUSHAL N. KAMBLE, ADVOCATES) AND: THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, KARNATAKA RURAL INFRASTRUCTURE, DEVELOPMENT LIMITED, 4TH AND 5TH FLOOR, GRAMEENABHIVRUDDHI BHAVAN, ANAND RAO CIRCLE, BENGALURU-560 009. … RESPONDENT (BY SRI. RAJSHEKHAR BURJI, ADVOCATE) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:6809 WP No. 101827 of 2025 ORAL ORDER Sri.S.S.Chalawadi., counsel for the petitioner and Sri.Rajshekhar Burji., counsel for the respondent have appeared in person. 2. The captioned Writ Petition is filed seeking a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent to consider the representations dated:09.07.2024 and 14.10.2024 submitted by the petitioner vide Annexures-B and D. 3. Heard the arguments and perused the writ papers with care. 4. Counsel for the petitioner submits that a mandamus may be ordered directing the respondent to consider the representations dated:09.07.2024 and 14.10.2024 submitted by the petitioner vide Annexures-B and D. Counsel for the respondent submits that an appropriate order may be passed. 5. A Mandamus is ordered directing the respondent to consider the representations dated:09.07.2024 and 14.10.2024 submitted by the petitioner vide Annexures-B and D in - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:6809 WP No. 101827 of 2025 accordance with the law, within six weeks from the receipt of certified copy of this order, if not already considered. 6. Resultantly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. This Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE MRP/RH LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 63