HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU Case: CCP(S) No. 314/2025 Mohd. Tahir Pall ..... Petitioner(s)/Appellant(s) Through :- Mr. Mohd. Hafiz Nazki, Advocate Mr. Satinder Gupta, Advocate Vs Manoj Dhar, Presently posted S.H.O. Police Station Kana Chak and Ors. .....Respondent(s) Through :- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE ORDER5R 19.09.2025 After arguing for a while, when confronted with the maintainability of the instant contempt petition, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks withdrawal of the instant contempt petition with liberty to seek appropriate remedy under law, as he could not make out a case for initiation of contempt under the contempt of Court Act for alleged violation. His statement is taken on record. In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the instant contempt petition is dismissed as withdrawn along with connected application(s), with liberty as prayed for. (WASIM SADIQ NARGAL) JUDGE JAMMU 19.09.2025 Mihul Sr. No. 1 Mihul Singh 2025.09.22 13:20 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document