SHIVAPPA BASAVANNEPPA HADAPAD @ NAVALGI, v. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER,
WP/60953/2011 · 2025-01-23
Suraj Govindaraj
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 4653 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 4653 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:1273 WP No. 60953 of 2011
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 60953 OF 2011 (KLR-RR/SUR) BETWEEN:
SHIVAPPA BASAVANNEPPA HADAPAD @ NAVALGI, AGE: 48 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O JUMMA MASJID GALLI, ALNAVAR VILLAGE, TQ. AND DIST. DHARWAD …PETITIONER (BY SRI. AHAMED ALI J. RAHIMAN SHAH, ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, DHARWAD DISTRICT, DHARWAD.
2.
PATTAN (TOWN) PANCHAYAT ALNAVAR, BY ITS CHIEF OFFICER, ALNAVAR, TQ. AND DIST. DHARWAD
3.
VIJAY HANAMANT HASETEKAR, AGE: MAJOR, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O ASHOK ROAD, SALNAVAR VILLAGE, TQ. AND DIST. DHARWAD. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. M.M.KHANNUR, AGA FOR R1;
SRI. SURESH P.HUDEDGADDI, ADVOCATE FOR R2;
SRI. SRINAND PACHHAPURE, ADVOCATE FOR R3)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO, DIRECT TO RESPONDENT NO.2 TO ENTER THE NAME OF PETITIONER IN ITS RECORDS; CALL FOR THE RECORDS PERTAINING TO T.M.C.
NO.2314, THE IMMOVABLE PROPERTY OF THE PETITIONER AND ETC.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
GIRIJA A BYAHATTI Digitally signed by GIRIJA A BYAHATTI Date: 2025.01.24 16:35:14 +0530
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:1273 WP No. 60953 of 2011
ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ)
1. The petitioner is before this Court seeking for the following reliefs: i. Respondent No.2 to enter the name of petitioner in its records; ii. Call for the records pertaining to T.M.C. No.2314, the immovable property of the petitioner; iii. And pass such other orders, which this Hon’ble Court deems fit and necessary under the facts and circumstances of the case.
2. Despite the order dated 07.01.2025, none appears for the petitioner today also. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the matter.
3. Hence, the petition stands dismissed for non- prosecution.
Sd/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE
gab CT-MCK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 42