VELPULA SRINIVASA RAO v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
WP/26413/2025 · 2025-09-25
Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 46520 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 46520 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010506982025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY,THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 26413 OF 2025 Between:
1. VELPULA SRINIVASA RAO, S/o. Chinna Subbaiah, aged about 41 years, Occ. Business, R/o. Door No. 5 Sattenapalli Town and Mandal Palnadu District
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, Rep. by the Principal Secretary, Honne Department, Secretariat Buildings, At velagapudi, Amaravathi, A.P.,
2. The Superintendent of Police, Narasaraopet, Palnadu District. 3. The SubDivisional Police Officer, Sattenapalli, Palnadu Distri Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the 4th Respondent police personal in registering an FIR, completing the investigation and filing of charge sheet against the criminal complaint lodged by the petitioner herein on 10.09.2025 before respondents 2 to 4 and consequently direct the 2 respondent to dispose of the representation made by the petitioner IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY,THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA PETITION NO: 26413 OF 2025
1. VELPULA SRINIVASA RAO, S/o. Chinna Subbaiah, aged about 41 years, Occ. Business, R/o. Door No. 5-10-14/18, 9th Ward, Nagarjuna Nagar, Sattenapalli Town and Mandal Palnadu District ...Petitioner AND ANDHRA PRADESH, Rep. by the Principal Secretary, Honne Department, Secretariat Buildings, At velagapudi, Amaravathi, A.P.,
2. The Superintendent of Police, Narasaraopet, Palnadu District. 3. The SubDivisional Police Officer, Sattenapalli, Palnadu District.
...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the 4th Respondent police personal in registering an FIR, completing the investigation and filing of charge sheet against the criminal complaint lodged by the petitioner herein on respondents 2 to 4 and consequently direct the 2 respondent to dispose of the representation made by the petitioner IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
FRIDAY,THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
1. VELPULA SRINIVASA RAO, S/o. Chinna Subbaiah, aged about 41 years, 14/18, 9th Ward, Nagarjuna Nagar, ...Petitioner ANDHRA PRADESH, Rep.
by the Principal Secretary, Honne Department, Secretariat Buildings, At velagapudi, Amaravathi, A.P., ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the 4th Respondent police personal in registering an FIR, completing the investigation and filing of charge sheet against the criminal complaint lodged by the petitioner herein on respondents 2 to 4 and consequently direct the 2 respondent to dispose of the representation made by the petitioner
10.09.2025 is illegal and arbitrary and violation of Art.21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents 3 and 4 to register an FIR, complete the investigation and file charge sheet in a fixed time frame and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the Respondents 3 and 4 to register an FIR against the respondents 5 to 9 by considering the representation dated 10.09.2025, pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: RAMESH BABU NELATURI Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following order:
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 26413 OF 2025
ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for:
“…pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the 4th Respondent police personal in registering an FIR, completing the investigation and filing of charge sheet against the criminal complaint lodged by the petitioner herein on 10.09.2025 before respondents 2 to 4 and consequently direct the 2 respondent to dispose of the representation made by the petitioner 10.09.2025 is illegal and arbitrary and violation of Art.21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents 3 and 4 to register an FIR, complete the investigation and file charge sheet in a fixed time frame and pass...…”
2. Heard Sri N.Ramesh Babu, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the relief has become infructuous in this matter.
4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader is in attendance.
5. Recording the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed since the relief has become infructuous. No order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATAJYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 26.09.2025 KKV
HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
W.P.No.26413 of 2025
Dated.26.09.2025
KKV