[2025:RJ-JP:49756] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14652/2023 1. Umesh Kumar Sharma Son Of Shri Ramniwas Sharma, Aged About 49 Years, Resident Of Near Kaila Devi Temple, Sodala, Gangapur City, District Sawaimadhopur (Raj.) 2. Shiv Prakash Gupta Son Of Shri Radha Vallabh Gupta, Aged About 47 Years, Resident Of Near Madan Mohan Ji Temple, Karauli, District Karauli (Raj.) 3. Lekhraj Singh Son Of Virendra Singh, Aged About 47 Years, Resident Of Near Madan Mohan Ji Temple, Karauli, District Karauli (Raj.) 4. Shri Krishan Upadhyay Son Of Purushottam Lal Sharma, Aged About 47 Years, Resident Of Near Dr. P.k. Sharma Nursing Home, Karauli (Raj.) 5. Hukam Singh Mali Son Of Kishan Lal Mali, Aged About 45 Years, Resident Of Vpo- Nandi Barkheda, Tehsil And District Karauli (Raj.) 6. Deepak Pratap Singh Son Of Roop Singh, Aged About 39 Years, Resident Of Near Kaila Devi Temple, Sodala, Gangapur City, District Sawaimadhopur (Raj.) 7. Vikram Singh Son Of Shri Roop Singh, Aged About 41 Years, Resident Of Vpo- Vivek Vihar Colony, Karaul, District Karauli (Raj.) 8. Vivek Sharma Son Of Shri Radha Ballabh Sharma, Aged About 38 Years, Resident Of Teen Bar, Gangapur Road, Karauli (Raj.) ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Additional Chief Secretary, Rural Development And Panchayati Raj Department, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.) 2. The Secretary, Department Of Personal, Government Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.) 3. The District Program Coordinator (Egs) And Collector, District Karauli (Raj.) 4. The Chief Executive Officer Cum Additional District Program Coordinator, Zila Parishad Karauli (Raj.) [2025:RJ-JP:49756] (2 of 3) [CW-14652/2023] 5. The Development Officer Cum Program Officer, Panchayat Samiti Karauli, District Karauli (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. G.S. Gauttam For Respondent(s) : Mr. Kapil Prakash Mathur, AAG Mr. Archit Bohra, AGC Mr. V.D. Gathala, AGC HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 05/12/2025 1. Instant writ petition is preferred by petitioners with following prayer: “a) The respondents may kindly be directed to issue appointment orders in favour of petitioners on the post of data entry operator cum computer operator as per rule 12 of contractual hiring rule, 2022; b) The respondents may kindly be directed to allow to the petitioners to perform their duty on the post of data entry operator cum computer operator by issuing appointment orders under contractual hiring rule 2022 with all consequential benefits; c) May kindly be issue direction to the respondents for not replace to the petitioners from another set-up of contractual employee; d) Any other order or direction which this Hon’ble Court deems just and proper may also be passed in favour of the petitioner.” 2. Learned counsel for petitioners while referring and relying upon order dated 26.08.2025 in D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.11737/2024 titled as Rodu Lal and Ors. Vs. The State of Rajashtan and ors. submits that the controversy [2025:RJ-JP:49756] (3 of 3) [CW-14652/2023] and the issue raised herein is already settled by a Division Bench of this Hon’ble Court at Principal Seat, Jodhpur. He further submits that instant writ petition be disposed of in accordance with aforesaid order. 3. Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for parties and also material placed on record, the writ petition is disposed of in terms of order dated 26.08.2025 in D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.11737/2024 titled as Rodu Lal and Ors. Vs. The State of Rajashtan and ors (supra) passed by a Division Bench of this Court at Principal Seat, Jodhpur, if applicable upon facts of the case. 4. The veracity of facts are not verified by the Court but respondents are under an obligation to consider and verify the facts of case, before applying ratio in case of Rodu Lal and Ors. (supra). 5. The Writ Petition and Misc. Application, if any, also stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J MR/276