APHC010583972011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] WEDNESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 25878/2011 Between: 1. B.R. RATNASHREE, W/O.S.K. CHANDRA SHEKAR HOUSE HOLD DUTIES R/O. SRI BALAJI TRADES, AMARAPURAM, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT. 2. ., W/O.S.K. CHANDRA SHEKAR HOUSE HOLD DUTIES R/O. SRI BALAJI TRADES, AMARAPURAM, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. HINDUSTAN PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD A GOVT OF INDIA, ENTERPRISES) HAVING ITS REGISTRATION OFFICE AT 17, JAMSHEDJI, TATA ROAD, MUMBAI, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR. 2. HINDUSTAN PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD A GOVT OF INDIA, ENTERPRISES) VIJAYAWADA LPG REGIONAL OFFICE, IDA, KONDAPALLI, KRISHNA DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY ITS COORDINATOR. 3. HINDUSTAN PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD A GOVT OF INDIA, ENTERPRISES) ANANTAPUR REGIONAL OFFICE, R.R. MANSION, 1-4-609, 2ND FLOOR HLC COLONY, ANANTAPUR - 515 001. REPRESENTED BY ITS COORDINATOR. 4. G B SHIVA KUMAR, S/O. G. BANDEER GOUD R/O. D.NO. 298, GUDIBANDA VILLAGE AND MANDAL, MADAKASIRA VIA ANANTAPUR DISTRICT. 2 JS,J W.P.No.25878/2011 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in issuing the conditional letter of intent (LOI) dated 21.07.2011 issued in favour of the 4th respondent for allotment of HP Gas Dealership at Amarapuram Mandal as illegal, arbitrary and violation of the conditions mentioned in the notification and consequently direct the respondents to disqualify the candidature of the 4th respondent for allotment of H.P.Gas Distributionship, Amarapuram Mandal, Anantapur District IA NO: 1 OF 2011(WPMP 31904 OF 2011 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the conditional letter of intent (LOI) dated 21.07.2011 issued in favour of the 4th respondent by considering the complaint of the petitioner to the grievance cell on .08.2011 of the respondents 1 to 3 pending disposal of the writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. RAVI SHANKAR JANDHYALA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. M JAYARAM REDDY 2. SREEKANTH REDDY AMBATI 3. K V SIMHADRI The Court made the following 3 JS,J W.P.No.25878/2011 ORDER: When the matter was listed on 11.08.2025, there was no representation on behalf of the learned counsel for the petitioners. Hence, the matter was directed to be posted under the caption of ‘For Dismissal’ on 18.08.2025. On 18.08.2025 also there was no representation on their behalf. Hence, the matter was again listed on 10.09.2025. Even on that day also, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioners. 2. On the other hand, learned Standing Counsel appearing for respondent Nos.1 to 3 submits that the 4th respondent is operating the petrol bunk since the year 2011. 3. Considering the submission made by learned Standing Counsel, the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand dismissed. __________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Date: 10.09.2025 KAS